Adam Howard
Well-known member
I truly do support XenForo and hope they come out on top in their current legal issues.
I was going to post a reply, but its probably not a good idea to criticize the judge at all...I don't know if this is a similar reason, but this article didn't give me the warm and fuzzy about this judge.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/aug/16/local/me-judge-real16
Jamie
I was going to post a reply, but its probably not a good idea to criticize the judge at all...
Let's just pray he's retired by the time it gets to court.I was going to post a reply, but its probably not a good idea to criticize the judge at all...
Let's just pray he's retired by the time it gets to court.![]()
The funny part about all this is the fact that vB 3 owners not doing business with IB has absolutely nothing to do with the development of Xenforo, but it is all due to the fraudulent licensing changes enacted by Bob Brisco and Ray Morgan.
In addition, the claim in the lawsuit that Internet Brands owns Xenforo software is laughable, I think the jury will agree with both of my statements in this post since there is plenty of evidence in the public domain as well as in the coding of XF software that there is no duplication of code and that means there is no copyright infringement.
The funny part about all this is the fact that vB 3 owners not doing business with IB has absolutely nothing to do with the development of Xenforo, but it is all due to the fraudulent licensing changes enacted by Bob Brisco and Ray Morgan.
In addition, the claim in the lawsuit that Internet Brands owns Xenforo software is laughable,.
Yeah, if you do not have to deal with a stupid ignorant jury that is easily playable by crafty lawyers. Which unfortunately happens all the time.In addition, the claim in the lawsuit that Internet Brands owns Xenforo software is laughable, I think the jury will agree with both of my statements in this post since there is plenty of evidence in the public domain as well as in the coding of XF software that there is no duplication of code and that means there is no copyright infringement.
Yes, BUT, a judge can ignore the jury and overrule it...has been known to happen. Usually gets thrown out on appeal but that costs time and money. But he was eligible to retire in 1985ultimately the jury will decide![]()
If he's like my dad who is about the same age, he knows zip about the internet. My dad is a smart man, it's just computer technology is beyond him. Freecell is about all a computer is good for in his opinion.Elizabeth - Looks like that query timed out.
Here's the judge himself. Really doesn't look 85, IMO.
I'm not, what I am posting is public knowledge.The judge is a fine man, let's not vilify him in any way.
One can hope he will call in some experts.he will then try to look for good expertise and take more time to learn about the facts.
No judge is going to stop doing their job due to sympathetic reasons... otherwise they wouldn't be a judge any longer. Sympathy and judge don't equate... hence why jury's exist, being the human component without the law degree, that get to apply the law + commonsense + humanity as required.I don't know if this is a similar reason, but this article didn't give me the warm and fuzzy about this judge.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/aug/16/local/me-judge-real16
Jamie
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.