XF 1.4 Miscellaneous Improvements

Today, we have some more improvements coming in XenForo 1.4. Individually, these features are not big enough to dedicate an entire HYS thread, but some of them have been heavily requested nonetheless.

Limiting watched content notifications to active users
ss-2014-07-16_11-54-51.webp

As you can probably work out from the screenshot, if this option is enabled, users that have not visited recently will not receive (or be considered for) alerts and emails from content they watch. This is mostly done for performance reasons. However, you can probably assume that if a user doesn't visit your forum for a long period of time, they aren't interested in the content they're watching and are unlikely to return. Stopping emails to them may prevent an invalid spam report.

While this situation can happen with watched threads (such as a long dead thread being updated), the situation more likely comes up with watched forums -- especially if you actively encourage watching a particular forum (or even use an add-on to automatically watch that forum).

The performance benefit comes from two parts: these users will not be selected when checking who to notify (reducing memory usage) and simply not notifying someone (reducing the amount of work necessary).

Limit auto-complete and birthday lists to active users
Similar to the previous option, username auto-complete and birthday lists are now limited to only showing users that have been active (somewhat) recently. The goal in both cases is to filter out users that are unlikely to be contacted or sought out.

As it stands, this is not option controlled and defaults to users active in the last 180 days.

Member list viewing permission
A very common suggestion, a new "View member lists" permission has been created to cover a number of places, including:
  • Online user lists
  • Notable members list
  • Full members list
  • Full recent activity list (see below)

If a user does not have this permission, they will not see the members tab but it doesn't necessarily control 100% of the content within that. The permission does limit access to the full "recent activity" page as well, partially for technical reasons and partially because it can "surface" users that may not have been obviously active otherwise.

This permission does not control access to the full profile pages itself and the content on those pages; you should use the existing "View member profiles" permission for that. If a user without the "View member lists" permission but with the "View member profiles" permission sees a post by a user, they can get to the poster's profile. In normal cases, you would likely disable access to profiles if you disable access to member lists but the permission doesn't mandate it.

User title ladder flexibility
Until XenForo 1.4, user titles were based only on trophy points. If you didn't have a specific user title, as you got more trophy points, you worked your way up a "ladder" of user titles.

The point of using trophy points for this was to make it much more flexible than just a simple value based on the number of posts you've made. Trophy points can be awarded for a range of behaviors and actions, so this would indirectly allow you to attach titles to these behaviors (such as maintaining a good like-to-post ratio over a length of time, etc).

However, we often received feedback that this was too complex. Now, you can define your user title ladder based on one of several fields:
ss-2014-07-16_12-19-54.webp

While trophy points is still the default, "messages" allows you to use a simple message count-based ladder. Similarly, "likes" is based on the number of likes a user has received.

Online status indicator on messages
Another very common suggestion was to indicate if a user is online right now when you view a message. This can now be seen in the upper right corner of the user's avatar:
ss-2014-07-16_12-22-59.webp

When the user is not online (or invisible), no indicator is shown.

We've taken an understated approach to this as it's information that can be useful in specific situations but is not normally fundamental and we didn't want it to draw too much attention.

If you wish to customize the look of this, there is a new style property (Author Online Status Indicator) that controls the visual aspect of it. Additionally, the "messageUserBlock" HTML element also gains the "online" class which can be used to customize any element of it or within it.

As you can probably guess, there is an option to control whether this indicator is shown:
ss-2014-07-16_12-32-20.webp




That's all for today. Still plenty more to show though, so until next time... :)

Just a reminder: Please do not post suggestions in this thread (even if you feel they are related). Use the dedicated suggestion forum so they can be tracked; suggestions made in this thread are unlikely to be implemented.
 
Last edited:
I answered that earlier in the thread.
You can simply use !$online, or whatever the actual param name is (I haven't seen the code yet).

Having an indicator for not online seems superfluous to me.
If there's no green dot then they are obviously offline.

That's basically what I was inferring by "I've only consulted myself, though".
This is only my opinion, guys. ;) Just I would like that this is implemented directly in the core, but if this is not the case, it does not matter. (y)
 
This is how it currently works:

Online and visible - green dot
Online and invisible - green dot for users with the bypass privacy permission, otherwise nothing
Offline - nothing

Hmm! Interesting. I bet a template modification would be easy to work with to customize things a bit. Nice!

I don't think I've used the "bypass privacy" permission but, if I understand it correctly, would this be a permission the staff would use to "see" members who have chosen certain privacy settings that block them from "normal" members? I know our staff can already see hidden members (they are all set as moderators) so, perhaps, I might already be using it.
 
I understand that having a grey/red icon for offline users and having no icon are the same things, but we can understand that as forum admins, not all users will be able to get that.

We'll get 100's of questions asking "Why isn't it shown if a user is offline just like skype/facebook etc" if there is no icon to indicate offline status and only indicating online status. Users who aren't technically advanced or new to forums in itself will be the ones confused at first, and personally I think to maintain consistency an offline icon is a must, because that is what 99.9% of the online indicators do and people are used to that.

It's better to keep that optional and have people who don't want the red/grey icon for offline users remove them via template edits, rather than have it the other way around which would be wanted by the majority (and is done by the majority of other online indicators).
 
It's better to keep that optional and have people who don't want the red/grey icon for offline users remove them via template edits, rather than have it the other way around which would be wanted by the majority (and is done by the majority of other online indicators).

I'm OK with template edits myself, in either direction (adding an offline indicator myself, for instance, or having to remove it if I didn't want it). I'm sure once 1.4 goes live, someone will create a resource that will show how to add the extra touches to the online indicator.

You raised a good point though--so many other services use an empty indicator to indicate "offline". Everything from instant messaging to the online/offline indicators I've seen used even in vB. Mine is not so much grey as it is a transparent grey dot that lets the background show through a bit--it looks more like an extinguished indicator light that way, not a grey dot. Opacity is somewhere between 40-60%.
 
We'll get 100's of questions asking "Why isn't it shown if a user is offline just like skype/facebook etc" if there is no icon to indicate offline status and only indicating online status. Users who aren't technically advanced or new to forums in itself will be the ones confused at first, and personally I think to maintain consistency an offline icon is a must, because that is what 99.9% of the online indicators do and people are used to that.
Facebook doesn't indicate if a user is offline, they only show a green dot if they are online (or a phone if they are online, but mobile) and nothing if they are offline. So, someone used to how Facebook functions, would recognize the lack of the online indicator means they are offline.
 
Facebook doesn't indicate if a user is offline, they only show a green dot if they are online (or a phone if they are online, but mobile) and nothing if they are offline. So, someone used to how Facebook functions, would recognize the lack of the online indicator means they are offline.

It actually indicates either way, but I agree.

NyvDK9r.png
 
Member list viewing permission
A very common suggestion, a new "View member lists" permission has been created to cover a number of places, including:
  • Online user lists
  • Notable members list
  • Full members list
  • Full recent activity list (see below)

If a user does not have this permission, they will not see the members tab but it doesn't necessarily control 100% of the content within that. The permission does limit access to the full "recent activity" page as well, partially for technical reasons and partially because it can "surface" users that may not have been obviously active otherwise.

This permission does not control access to the full profile pages itself and the content on those pages; you should use the existing "View member profiles" permission for that. If a user without the "View member lists" permission but with the "View member profiles" permission sees a post by a user, they can get to the poster's profile. In normal cases, you would likely disable access to profiles if you disable access to member lists but the permission doesn't mandate it.


Great, now I don't need the addon ragtek Hide Memberlist for Guests 1.1 anymore if this can all be done with permissions.

One question, however, what will be returned if they try to access the page without permission granted?
Right now I am getting a lot of Google cralwer errors for 403 when it tries to follow profiles. Will this help resolve those errors?
 
I wonder where i can find setting of "Member list viewing permission"?
I've checked Admin > Users > Permissions > User Groups Permissions
 
Top Bottom