there is so many site who uses custom setup and custom add on, and lots of premium add on, i think large forums need minimun 5-7K to even think about upgrade, even small forum with couple premium add ons need 100-300$ to renew or buy same add on for XF2.
But there are features in the XF2 core that are not in the XF1 core.
We’re not going to provide a running commentary on development, but I can at least confirm that development of XF2.1 is well under way. And, as is typical with our previous releases and that of our competitors, more details will be released via the HYS forum closer to the time.Now my question about what the status about XF 2.1 is, was ignored (or not answered yet).
It seems to me that xf is 2 steps behind from modern counterparts.
Good enough for me. Thanks.but I can at least confirm that development of XF2.1 is well under way.
I'm not one to fanboy a brand, but what exactly have IPS and WBB added that is revolutionary that XF doesn't have?It seems to me that xf is 2 steps behind from modern counterparts. IPS made great progress since their 4.2 launch, WBB has a lot of essential packages, and basically any niche forum out there died and is basically a subreddit of reddit now. Facebook is trying to become more like a forum and all of them (social media giants) have apps and APIs.
Professional newsletters would be interesting, I think a feature suggestion already exists. What does "online banking payments" mean? Some countries have bank transfer methods, typically some European ones that have Stripe support, but generally bank transfers are subject to manual approval, things like ACH, Faster Payments, CHAPS, SEPA. Those kinds of things can't really be added.Professional newsletters in the core, online banking payments in the core etc., these are features we need to grow and make more money.
Why only PayPal?
One man's must-have feature is another man's bloatware ^^
Not talking about revolutionary regarding the other 2 forum software.I'm not one to fanboy a brand, but what exactly have IPS and WBB added that is revolutionary that XF doesn't have?
I agree. I also prefer XF. XF's support and community is A+. The product is very fast and secure and since the new polish it looks also very neat.I don't find XF two steps behind, it's still my preferred forum platform for traditional threaded discussions. It's also far cheaper than IPS and, at least as far as I've found, has a more friendly community in general. I don't know about WBB.
I don't grab the pitchfork. And I am not saying that the changes are trivial.Honestly, use what platform best suits your needs. But XF2 was a great upgrade and changed massively under the hood, to call it trivial is a massive understatement. It's a complete change in design and a well welcomed and needed one at that. For those critical of it in this thread, perhaps wait until the x.X updates which aim to add more usable features before grabbing the pitchforks.
About IPS and WBB.
Both have a calendar(events). This is essential. Any kind of social media platform uses this. Even Twitch integrated a sidebar for incoming events.
Most reddit sidebars have it. Facebook has it and anybody should be familiar with Google Calendar.
I don't want to hear "I don't need it, so it is only essential to you". No, that is invalid arguement, as the majority and the big players have it integrated, both mentioned forum software, too.
IPS also has ecommerce, blogs (so does WBB), cms and since 4.2 clubs. Clubs seems to be very popular.
Even for a discussion forum it makes sense. For example to see birthdays of users listed or to announce daily/weekly/monthly threads for all users to participate in. The question is, which niche actually can't use a calendar at all? You need to name me one example. Any niche can use it. Sure, there will be some who will use it heavily, and some not at all. But saying "it makes no sense" makes no sense. You shouldn't talk like you determine what makes sense or not.A calendar for a social media platform where you can arrange events makes sense. A calendar for a discussion forum doesn't (aside from some specific niches).
I listed more than just "other forums". So Facebook, Twitch and reddit are just "other forums"?Just because other forums include it doesn't mean they're right.
A better question would be how many forums are alive at all so you can go and start deducting numbers from the 1% of the market share forum software hold. Or you just look at the rest 99% (billions of users in social media) and maybe, just maybe you can learn 1 or 2 things.A better question would be how many IPS and WBB forums actually use their calendar? I suspect it's very few.
What kind of a question is this? Why do we need to draw an artificial line somewhere in those intangible words?I guess it all comes down to, is XF a forum or a platform?
So it is actually ok when Social Media steals from traditional forums, but forum software should just stick to its oldfashioned way? Don't innovate, don't progress.If it's a platform to build a website/community around then borrowing things from Facebook, etc makes sense (but Facebook does it better, has a bigger audience and far more resources so you're fighting somewhat of a losing battle).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.