XenForo 2.0 Discussion

[XenForo]

Official updates have been split into a separate thread:

https://xenforo.com/community/threads/xenforo-2-0-development-updates.113262/

This thread now specifically represents discussion surrounding XenForo 2.0.

 

[mjda]

Sweet!!

 

[Daniel Hood]

I'm intrigued.

You mentioned framework, is Zend still a part of that? From an addon standpoint, how much stuff will be different? Still using DataWriters, for example?

 

[Robby]

And thank you for making the best forum software out there.

 

[Jay]

The "Like" button should be replaced with a "Love" button for the first post.

 

[Teapot]

This is brilliant news, and I'm really, really looking forward to what new features XF 2.0 will have now we can allow for backwards compatibility breaks I would love it if developers can get more features that allow us to work closer to a "modern" workflow - I'm using SASS/Grunt heavily these days and I love how painless they make development. Being able to commit my custom add-ons into their Git repositories without having to symlink the js/, library/ and styles/ folders within would be lovely too..

That said, XF 1.x s still the finest community platform (the forums are but a minor part of my site!) I have ever had the pleasure to work with, the support the quickest and most helpful, and easily the most flexible and powerful platform to build upon. Bravo.

 

[Barbossa]

Redactor editor or any, should be easy to include any jQuery plugins there. Microsoft, google and/or, there are other many 3rd party company that give us transliteration services but none of them is easy to integrate with our xenforo editor. For example, I go to at least 15 fine coders here to hire to include this into our xenforo editor. How come all of them got failed!

 

[Weydigo]

For XenForo 2.0, I would love to have a system of themes better organized (such as IP.Board 4.0). The current one is really too complicated and very poorly organized...

 

[Velli]

Fantastic!

 

[Liam W]

I look forward to seeing what XF 2.0.0 has to offer... Although I'm dreading having to re-learn how to make addons for it...

is appropriate for a x.X-level release

Surely that should be 'is appropriate for an x.X-level release'?

Liam

 

[agison]

I look forward to seeing what XF 2.0.0 has to offer... Although I'm dreading having to re-learn how to make addons for it...



Surely that should be 'is appropriate for an x.X-level release'?

Liam

Pascal?

 

[Sim]

Addons as Packagist packages - w00t!

 

[erich37]

awesome news !!!

 

[Wildcat Media]

Nice! Exactly what a major version should be.

 

[Recep Baltaş]

I am using PHP 5.4.30 and the minimum PHP should be 5.4, Not 5.3. You guys should push the web forward!

 

[The Sandman]

So... we are at a tipping point!

 

[euantor]

A PHP version requirement to >5.3 will be very welcome. Hopefully that means proper name spacing

 

[John L.]

Such a great post with good insight. I would love to see if developers could apply to early access with a major release. Signing an NDA wouldn't be an issue of course.

 

[Liam W]

Such a great post with good insight. I would love to see if developers could apply to early access with a major release. Signing an NDA wouldn't be an issue of course.

(It would be for those under 18. Unless they allow parent countersignatories.)

 

[Daniel Hood]

Such a great post with good insight. I would love to see if developers could apply to early access with a major release. Signing an NDA wouldn't be an issue of course.

That would definetely be nice and would help with everyone that needs to port larger add ons.