In the US a response to the complaint must be filed by December 6th. In the UK allocation questionnaires must be filed by December 8th.
I don't think it would be beneficial.if it would be beneficial for XFs defense.
There are a million of these statements in the wild anyway, but nice thoughtKier,
Would it help if we put statements that our interest in XF due to bad management at IB on paper and send it to the XF offices? I would happily do so if it would be beneficial for XFs defense.
There are a million of these statements in the wild anyway, but nice thought
Kier,
Would it help if we put statements that our interest in XF due to bad management at IB on paper and send it to the XF offices? I would happily do so if it would be beneficial for XFs defense.
vB/IB is claiming as part of their causes of action in the lawsuit that XF conspired to steal their customers, so customers leaving vB software and looking for other options due to the actions of IB when Ray Morgan was running the show (before he was fired) are critical to XF defense in this case.
Well... if XF's legal need straight out customers saying otherwise, if they sent out a notice to all paid customers requesting to sign an affidavit or such that I shifted freely and had nothing to do with Kier and Mike, but the product I was using and the company methods behind that product... I would sign in a heartbeat.vB/IB is claiming as part of their causes of action in the lawsuit that XF conspired to steal their customers, so customers leaving vB software and looking for other options due to the actions of IB when Ray Morgan was running the show (before he was fired) are critical to XF defense in this case.
What does that have to do with the suit?i think during the trial, the judge should call in webmasters of vb4 owners like digitalpoint owner and expplain himself why many would move away from vb4 and the license structure cause uproar
Talking with Veritas and Chronos a lot and they suspect it's one of those "throw everything on the wall and hope it sticks scenario." It's a classic legal tactic in hopes to score a legal victory even in one area.
This way Internet Brands can claim they were victorious even though it is on one minor, trivial count.
It's probably best we do get involved as we put our foot down and say back off. I'm tired of Internet Brands having the attention of a two year old with attention deficit hyperactive disorder. Internet Brands needs to really work on their SDLC.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.