more than once the old vbulletin licensing scheme was referred to as the inspiration.'Good faith' isn't a reason not to read the license agreement, or details for renewal. Also, not once did anyone of authority make mention of the pricing be like vBulletin's old renewal model, that was purely your assumption.
I will say that we have been leaning heavily towards an owned-license-plus-yearly-renewal scheme that resembles the way that vBulletin used to be licensed, rather than a pay-per-version model.
Also this does seem like an endless discussion but I know one thing, I purchased my license knowing full well there would be an annual renew.
It's not the renewal that's the problem, it's the fact that the renewal doubles and becomes the $80 "reactivation" fee if your license has been expired for 9 months or longer.
Your mention of vBulletin and IPB say otherwise; theres no point in bringing them up unless you're comparing them to XenForo. Also, their renewal system works, you're just unhappy with it because you didn't read the license terms, or didn't understand them (They're pretty clear).
I'd suggest making a new thread, as this one has gone from seeking information to complaining, and no alternatives have really been offered. Complaining does nothing, whereas if you appeal logically, and offer up a new solution that would be lucrative for XenForo, as well as fair to customers -without- comparing other forum solutions, and get enough people to back you without complaints, accusations, insults or anything else that would put them off, I'm sure they'll work with the customers.
As for losing access to modifications/support... I never understood why vBulletin allowed that in the first place. Quite honestly, people were capable of staying with an older version, and still get the same treatment as active customers. Thats like me buying a car and expecting the warranty to continue forever.
Ya.. but there is just TOO many of them. It will be hard to keep up.. that is unless one of them becomes dominate for resources. I can't see msyelf having to visit 3-4 different places. So I guess we will see if someone can get enough people to visit just one mods community forum.
I haven't got a problem with this if the product retains the quality and stability we have grown accustomed to. I like to keep on top of my updates and chances are customers who do to won't allow themselves to fall back on their update or renewals so chances are you'll be paying the 40$ annual renewal.
Let's be honest. who in their right mind allows their renewal to pass them by for that length of time?
The important part of this is this was not mentioned at any moment when we signed up to purchase a licence. So basically if you wish to push it with Trading Standards (if in UK) then you would have a very very good case.
Me I'm just getting sick of getting messed about by forum companies and I had hoped it wouldn't be the case with xF![]()
Err, it was mentioned well advance, it’s in the release announcement and on the 'buy it' page where there's a link called 'details'.
Me? I did with vbulletin and I do with IPB. I still renew, but when im ready too. I dont appreciate being told to renew or face a penalty.
I understand your point of view but as stated by others this was told in advance and documented. Chances are and i all serious the amount of people that fall behind will be in the minority. It's just like any billing system online or offline you are setup to pay.
There's an idea, perhaps an automated billing system feature where a customer can input a date for their renewal to be renewed? I dunno, just a suggestion for those who allow their billing to pass them by for a healthy length of time. Personally, I keep up with my bills and renewals whether it's online or offline.
There was no mention of the reactivation fee in the release announcement.
Really don't know what the problem is. As others have said, the point about renewals and reactivations was mentioned on the forum long before the beta was released. It is mentioned in the buying details on the main site, where you buy the software, under the details link. If you don't actually read the clearly linked details page then, sorry, you want to be more careful. That's what 'details' are for.
As Shelley also says, it's was mentioned long before release and was clearly documented. If people choose not to read clearly linked details then, with all due respect, that's their lookout.
One problem being you havent read the thread properly! I for one havent said anywhere I didnt know about the "reactivation fee". The majority of posts are not because people didnt know about it either. People are complaining because there is a reactivation fee aka a penalty.
Ive said it a few times, but I will repeat! I knew about the penalty, but still purchased two licences for $200 saving $80. I was hoping the powers that be may reconsider this penalty fee. If they dont, 3 months time I can sell my licences for the same price I purchased them at and get my money back! Nothing lost at all.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.