Actually, if you zoom in on that photo (as I did).... Size 3 looks bigger than 4Its not extremely noticeable, but there is a difference. size3 uses font-size: small;. size4 uses nothing.
Ah. I was going by visual display. Code could say whatever it wants, but the end result is the desired goal that matters.@Adam Howard, I'm going by what the code / css uses. And according to that, size3 is smaller since it has "font-size: small" attached to it while size4 utilizes the same definition as the rest of the message text.
Don't matter. Firefox 21 shows the same.Isn't FF 22 is beta?
No it doesn't.Don't matter. Firefox 21 shows the same.
(I find Firefox beta's are usually more stable than the final build... go figure)
I was thinking the same thing. lolCan I just say that demonstrating with anything but images is like trying to prove to someone what you see red as? Different browsers, OSes, and fonts may render this differently so if you're trying to demonstrate, use a screenshot.
I always believed size 3 was the standard size (or at least it was in TinyMCE). So arguably, don't make size 3 smaller, make size 4 bigger and those after it as well.Only solution I can see is to make size 3 visibly smaller which will make it even more smaller than it already is on the fonts where it seems to display normally.
^ disregard that comment. I was wrong. Size 4 was the default in TinyMCE.I always believed size 3 was the standard size (or at least it was in TinyMCE). So arguably, don't make size 3 smaller, make size 4 bigger and those after it as well.