The biggest thing is probably just setting the expectation that releases are likely to be smaller on the whole. Several features in XF 2.3 were completed years prior to its ultimate release (despite what odd conspiracies might have you believe), and with the benefit of hindsight I think it would have been better to have made them available earlier even if that meant others were deferred until later. Not to say that there aren't many other factors, of course.Just curious, was there anything that triggered this faster cadence behind the scenes?
QOL is the motif, but I think it's worth being clear that the scope for XF 2.4 is largely set already and expanding or changing it is the opposite of what we're trying to do . Though suggestions are useful for shaping future plans and we're hoping to be able to incorporate feedback sooner with more focused releases.Also, is there a motif or theme behind this update so the community can focus our collective suggestions? Eg. XFMG, moderator and admin quality of life, statistics, low hanging features with front-end impact