TinyMCE was in place for almost three years.No because I heard a new editor was on the way.
That's it?Also this editor looks worse because the toolbar is bigger.
I didn't understand, what does make toolbar more friendly? I've made some tests with mce4 and having several lines of buttons doesn't seem to be a problem for mobiles or for responsive design (the last thing must be confirmed, I've just made a test with a very small width).Of course it is. It makes the toolbar more mobile friendly.
Default:
View attachment 48084
30 seconds editing:
View attachment 48085
Changing the icon size from 24px to something like 18px and then repositioning the background image would make it even smaller.
All of the colours and gradients can likewise be changed very simply.
I honestly can't see what the issue is.
Far as I remember it was Brogan and personally I believe what Brogan says. I've always found him very very reliable. Maybe a couple of mistakes out of thousands and thousands of statements.Just because a moderator states something and makes a claim doesn't make it true. ... Who stated this btw?
I'm glad about that for those who like designing. My point which I obviously did not make clear, is that leaving an XF area without integrated design does not - integrate with XF beautification policy.this is easy for you to modify
All of the colours and gradients can likewise be changed very simply.
I honestly can't see what the issue is.
I'm going to nitpick here and offtopic so apologies for that.That is your opinion.
Far as I remember it was Brogan
Far as I remember it was Brogan and personally I believe what Brogan says. I've always found him very very reliable. Maybe a couple of mistakes out of thousands and thousands of statements.
I'm not going to disbelieve every statement every person makes - yes I'm a Sceptic, but there has to be limits or that way lies madness.
I'm glad about that for those who like designing. My point which I obviously did not make clear, is that leaving an XF area without integrated design does not - integrate with XF beautification policy.
This toolbar does not match XF.It looks like what it is. a bolt on from somewhere else.Apparently thanks Chris the larger icons that make this more obvious than on the old editor have good reason (noted for redesign) but the size aggravates the colour ugliness.@Chris Deeming thanks re size issue.
I'm not sure how I can explain it clearer (as you would say if positions were reversed!)
XF is excellent for those who want to redesign. That's the population you are referring to.
XF is ALSO excellent for those who DON'T want to redesign. It's sleek and pleasant, and the design is consistent and integrated. This toolbar is not.
My suggestion therefore is that its background gradient be made @primaryLightest as default. That way it integrates better, and will adjust gracefully for those who just do a limited style edit by changing a few key colours.
I'm going to nitpick here and offtopic so apologies for that.
If someone makes a statement and doesn't signal it's a quote, or citation, then yes it's their opinion. This doesn't need pointing out. It's obvious.
Miaow!
I am the only one who actually like the look of the editor?
There already are.(there'll likely be a few in Resources once this rolls out)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.