Green Cat
Active member
I somehow have no problem imagining you as a beeI am interested to [be a] bee

I somehow have no problem imagining you as a beeI am interested to [be a] bee
Oh dear :/I somehow have no problem imagining you as a bee![]()
Sorry couldn't resistOh dear :/
I meant see.
Sorry couldn't resist
BTW are the reason(s) for the dismissal on PACER yet ?
While iB has hired a one Patrick A. Fraioli Jr.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is
DENIED.
2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction is
DENIED.
3. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens, or to Stay
Proceedings Pending Conclusion of Parallel British Proceedings is DENIED.
4. Defendant has ten (10) days to answer Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Dated: February 15, 2011
10 days to answer complaint....
That is today !!
PS: Sorry, that is from date of order, not the hearing !!
lol maybe the judge is saying that it's less convenient for himselfNot less convenient compared to what? Isn't one of the parties flying across the ocean?
I say this because I defended a lawsuit against myself in the past and if it was on court days I would have never figured out what day was what.
Nope you weren't the only one.Was I the only one expecting to see some reasoning or rational for the denials? I mean, we knew it was denied, I just expected to find out why.
Yeah, I was definitely expecting a little more than, "the Court found that personal jurisdiction exists...". How did the court come to this conclusion is what I want to know. I think courts should have to justify their decisions.Was I the only one expecting to see some reasoning or rational for the denials? I mean, we knew it was denied, I just expected to find out why.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.