1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Not Planned Attachment URL Structure

Discussion in 'Closed Suggestions' started by x3sphere, Aug 1, 2010.

  1. x3sphere

    x3sphere Active Member

    Currently attachments are referenced in this URL format:

    I'm of the opinion that having the URL end in its original image extension is a better choice. Not sure how important it is, but this would improve compatibility with legacy browsers. When saving to disk, IE6 for instance recognizes the above resource as a bitmap, even though it's a GIF.

    So, in short, I feel attachment URLs should look something like this:

    It may offer a benefit SEO-wise as well. Sure, Google can handle both links when indexing images, but can all the other search engines out there?
  2. Cezz

    Cezz Well-Known Member

    RockCake likes this.
  3. Brandon_R

    Brandon_R Guest

    I think browsers are more likely to look at the content-type header returned than the extension of the url as that could be modified easily.
  4. x3sphere

    x3sphere Active Member

    Good point. All modern browsers check the content-type header, so it's not an issue there - just the few special cases with legacy browsers like IE6 that only seem to look at the extension.
  5. Derek Ivey

    Derek Ivey Member

    IE6 needs to die lol...
  6. Bulent

    Bulent New Member

    Hi all
    Is there any way to change xn image extension (....jpg.853/) to original image extension (....jpg).
  7. veraderock

    veraderock Member

Share This Page