Morgain
Well-known member
I was hoping you weren't so bothered about some of those things.
Small extra detail - Waindigo goes into a lot of detail later trying to show that
a) some things on the original site don't work well, and users on the site have complained about this, so Waindigo wants to improve it by cutting out the awkward bits uses don't like.
b) offering alternative functions that would work bettr.
I think myself if a client insists on having something their way, they are entitled to have it even if it is ugly or inefficient. I have had a couple of small runs with Waindigo on this issue - I want it MY way! but in the end I do get it the way I want it.
But I can also see that's tough on a coder who has high standards.
Mistakes were made by both parties.
Good summary. Neither made their agreement clear enough.
I note Waindigo has admitted he should have been clearer. Hope ibaker can do the same so they can move on to a solution.
$173 to close this seems fair.
Is this agreeable by both parties ?
I guess we're all waiting for ibaker. But he was very angry so I expect that will need a bit of time. Understandable.