mkucuksari
Well-known member
I have just notice that there is an update at UI.X2 Addon ([TH] UI.X · 2.0.8 Patch Level 2 -> 2.0.11) Can not see any update dteail ! . Is it a bug fix, right ?
I'll go ahead and report this as an issue on our issue tracker!I used XPress 1.0.0 Patch Level 5 with UI.X 2 and the problem is that the thumbnail doesn't show on the article list. I found this in the UI.X 2 (latest with Material Style). On the old 2.0.10.0.0 (the one that doesn't come with Material Style) doesn't have this problem. I have to manually removedisplay: none;
inthxpress.less
template to bring back the thumbnail.
Our developers just added a few phrases.I have just notice that there is an update at UI.X2 Addon ([TH] UI.X · 2.0.8 Patch Level 2 -> 2.0.11) Can not see any update dteail ! . Is it a bug fix, right ?
No official ETA but it is planned to be included in our next few theme releases! Be on the lookout for it.Any E.T.A for allowing us to move logo-block below?
Ty
Yes, I've provided a screenshot below.
Are you talking about UI.X 2 or UI.X Pro (Material)?I am testing using the Material Theme of UI.X and I noticed on the 'Discussions List' that mine is showing just who replied last and how many posts there were. Is there anyways to get it to display like the picture below? I would like who started it along with the page views back like in the picture below. I just can't seem to find where to enable it. Thanks!
View attachment 188395
Good morning @Dalton Prock this is on UI.X 2. I don't know if it's possible or not. I would be just nice to have the option to display the page numbers and views again.Are you talking about UI.X 2 or UI.X Pro (Material)?
Thanks @Dalton Prock . That is the default on UI.X 2, but when using the 'Material Theme' Child it displays different.Hello, so by default we do allow you too see who started the thread and who last replied along with showing page numbers/views. As shown on my screenshot which I will explain further, the left shows (avatar, username and date) who created the thread and then on the right shows (avatar, username, and date again) who last replied to the thread. As far as making it look the way you want it as shown in the picture,you would need to customize the theme then.
View attachment 188445
I see, I've started a conversation with you!Thanks @Dalton Prock . That is the default on UI.X 2, but when using the 'Material Theme' Child it displays different.
Not at this time no, we haven't released a 2.1 based version as of yet.Hello
Is the style compatible with XenForo 2.1? Actually, it looks like this:
View attachment 188582
child-uix_dark.xml
just import this as a grandchild of UI.X (a direct child of the style you make all of your customizations to). You'll also need to revert the Image Path
style property (search uix_imagePath
) and that should let you only upgrade UI.X and have dark inherit all of your changes The UI.X 2 Dark style comes with achild-uix_dark.xml
just import this as a grandchild of UI.X (a direct child of the style you make all of your customizations to). You'll also need to revert theImage Path
style property (searchuix_imagePath
) and that should let you only upgrade UI.X and have dark inherit all of your changes
Wow, what a bug! Thanks so much for reporting this as I will get it reported right now.Bold type not work in other font family: Verdana, Times New Roman. How can i fix?
Wow, you're right. Surprised no one else had noticed it yet - including me. Guess it just goes to show that most of us usually settle for the default font.Bold type not work in other font family: Verdana, Times New Roman. How can i fix?
Bold type not work in other font family: Verdana, Times New Roman. How can i fix?
I was able to get it to bold with no issues when changing the heavy font weight setting in Typography under Style Properties. The highest I set it was 600 to 700. Try that too see if it improves guys As some of these fonts don't entirely go bold when their heavy font weight is set to 500 or so.Wow, you're right. Surprised no one else had noticed it yet - including me. Guess it just goes to show that most of us usually settle for the default font.
You're right, Dalton, it was a simple change. And I had completely forgotten that I had had that problem with another of your styles months ago (Intrepid, I think) and that's how I fixed it. DohI was able to get it to bold with no issues when changing the heavy font weight setting in Typography under Style Properties. The highest I set it was 600 to 700. Try that too see if it improves guys As some of these fonts don't entirely go bold when their heavy font weight is set to 500 or so.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.