Dadparvar
Well-known member
What do you mean? Is it a marketplace?our commerce add-on
In fact, we need a marketplace. A full option marketplace.
If you are developing a marketplace then let us know a bit about it please.
What do you mean? Is it a marketplace?our commerce add-on
I have the sameAnyone else having issues with notifications? My users (and myself) seem to be getting every notification for the classifieds whenever anyone posts/edits/deletes a classified etc.
When an ad is marked sold it asks the person to enter The Other Party, and states that it is required. How do we make this optional?
ErrorException: Undefined index: user_criteria - library/GFNClassifieds/Model/Package.php:205
#0 /home/x/public_html/library/GFNClassifieds/Model/Package.php(205): XenForo_Application::handlePhpError(8, 'Undefined index...', '/home/x/...', 205, Array)
#1 /home/x/public_html/library/GFNClassifieds/Model/Package.php(193): GFNClassifieds_Model_Package->_verifyPrefixIsUsableInternal(Array, Array)
#2 /home/x/public_html/library/GFNClassifieds/ControllerPublic/Classified.php(798): GFNClassifieds_Model_Package->getUsablePackagesInCategories(1)
#3 /home/x/public_html/library/GFNClassifieds/ControllerPublic/Classified.php(748): GFNClassifieds_ControllerPublic_Classified->_getAddEditResponse(Array, Array, Array, Array)
#4 /home/x/public_html/library/XenForo/FrontController.php(351): GFNClassifieds_ControllerPublic_Classified->actionAdd()
#5 /home/x/public_html/library/XenForo/FrontController.php(134): XenForo_FrontController->dispatch(Object(XenForo_RouteMatch))
#6 /home/x/public_html/index.php(13): XenForo_FrontController->run()
#7 {main}
Request State
array(3) {
["url"] => string(57) "http://x/classifieds/categories/1/create-item/"
["_GET"] => array(0) {
}
["_POST"] => array(0) {
}
}
For the registered package, have you selected all other groups in the "User is NOT a member of any of the selected User Groups"?I installed RC5. It still did what it did before on packages, which is to show packages for EVERY group a member is a part of.
An active group member STILL sees a package for the ACTIVE group and the REGISTERED (basic) group.
This has been fixed in RC 5I have the same
That's basically how XenForo's permission system work. I'll see what I can do about this.Here's a showstopper for us pertaining to the bump system. Bump intervals inherit the higher/longer/more restrictive interval, whereas upgraded users should have a lower interval.
Yes, it's an issue I have yet to look at.We've also noticed that when the Trading Profile Member Profile tab is selected not all tabs are displayed.
Okay, will add it to my to-do list.One suggestion which would really help is the ability to limit classified title edits (including a time limit option). My users have a habit of editing their ads and changing the title to SOLD, which wrecks havoc on our SEO.
And it shall be addedAbility for admins and mods (permission based of course) to mark a classified as sold or bought.
I'll see what can be done about this.Marking as bought or sold to allow the input of final negotiated price so that the "Total Revenue Facilitated" is more accurate.
You can't at this moment. The way system sees it is that if you are marking the ad as closed, then the transaction has been done by a second party in this community.When an ad is marked sold it asks the person to enter The Other Party, and states that it is required. How do we make this optional?
That's a hard coded limit in the database table.How can we reduce the title limit from 100 characters?
Feedback IS 100% optional: the user can just go to another page, but I get your point. Maybe I should add a check box in the closing form asking if the user wants to rate the other party or not.+1, that's actually a bit of a show stopper for us too. I noticed when I was testing. Feedback should be 100% optional. @Mr. Goodie2Shoes
I might've missed this feature request.A feature request that I put in looong ago when using create classifieds thread and classified is featured I would love to see the relevant thread stickied automatically.
Yeah, it does make sense.The same goes for bumped classifieds, the appropriate thread should be auto bumped with some text 'BUMP'. Would make it a lot more cohesive.
Looks like the installer didn't get properly executed for the upgrade.getting this error:
This is due to the missing open_graph meta tags.I have error when i try share classified via fb.
Please tell me how showing packages made available to specific groups being available to a user belonging to the SAME groups is a bug? Just because it doesn't work the way you expected doesn't mean that it is a bug.So for example, if you have a group called active users which are also registered users (because everyone is a registered user to start with), the active user is offered 2 fees- one for active users, one for regular users.
I didn't mention anywhere in my post that I CORRECTED it, I just said I added support for user criteria that will give admins the ability to filter the packages more based on the user themselves.He also claims version RC5 corrected this, but it didn't.
The notification system is working correctly, the issue was related to a database entry that has been fixed in RC 5.Others are finding that the notification system does not work right.
Not coming online for a day does not mean disappearing. I have 8AM to 5PM classes three days a week: that is the only reason I can't come online every three days per week and there's nothing I can do about it this semester. Though I do try to get back to everyone from my mobile phone, but that's not always possible.Add to that that the coder disappears every now and then without notice
I installed RC5. It still did what it did before on packages, which is to show packages for EVERY group a member is a part of.
An active group member STILL sees a package for the ACTIVE group and the REGISTERED (basic) group.
I'd like to request a setup option to make the List View the default view for everyone rather than the Grid View.
That whole "upload a file" button really needs to go away or be optional in the application's set up.
Just give him a refund and send him on his way, he's been passive aggressive towards you for well over a year now...@Nelson T.
Please tell me how showing packages made available to specific groups being available to a user belonging to the SAME groups is a bug? Just because it doesn't work the way you expected doesn't mean that it is a bug.
I didn't mention anywhere in my post that I CORRECTED it, I just said I added support for user criteria that will give admins the ability to filter the packages more based on the user themselves.
The notification system is working correctly, the issue was related to a database entry that has been fixed in RC 5.
Not coming online for a day does not mean disappearing. I have 8AM to 5PM classes three days a week: that is the only reason I can't come online every three days per week and there's nothing I can do about it this semester. Though I do try to get back to everyone from my mobile phone, but that's not always possible.
That's basically how XenForo's permission system work. I'll see what I can do about this.
Yes, it's an issue I have yet to look at.
Okay, will add it to my to-do list.![]()
That's a hard coded limit in the database table.
You can't at this moment. The way system sees it is that if you are marking the ad as closed, then the transaction has been done by a second party in this community.
Feedback IS 100% optional: the user can just go to another page, but I get your point. Maybe I should add a check box in the closing form asking if the user wants to rate the other party or not.
Yeah, it can be confusingI'm not quite sure I understand this, you said it isn't optional in my reply then you said it is![]()
Yeah, it can be confusing
Rating the user: Optional
Selecting the user when marking the classified as closed: Required
Hello, thank for your reply. Hơ i can fix it?For the registered package, have you selected all other groups in the "User is NOT a member of any of the selected User Groups"?
This has been fixed in RC 5
That's basically how XenForo's permission system work. I'll see what I can do about this.
Yes, it's an issue I have yet to look at.
Okay, will add it to my to-do list.
And it shall be added
I'll see what can be done about this.
You can't at this moment. The way system sees it is that if you are marking the ad as closed, then the transaction has been done by a second party in this community.
That's a hard coded limit in the database table.
Feedback IS 100% optional: the user can just go to another page, but I get your point. Maybe I should add a check box in the closing form asking if the user wants to rate the other party or not.
I might've missed this feature request.
Yeah, it does make sense.
Looks like the installer didn't get properly executed for the upgrade.
This is due to the missing open_graph meta tags.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.