Yes, you did.
I'm done bothering with you because you're a waste of time and do nothing but start arguments for stupid ass reasons.
Hahahaha. If I am a waste of time to you, then leave me alone. Really, dude.
I don't like arguments, I don't like drama, I don't like people telling me I'm wrong in the worst possible way. Which you are on the verge of doing.
I said Matt Cutts, who is pretty much the de facto source for legitimate information relating to Google and their practices regarding SEO says they do not rate plural or singular domains differently.
Yeah! They don't want you to know all the secrets of Google, especially not Matt Cutts! Advice from the same company that makes the actual algorithm is not exactly a good source of information for me. It's the same $#!^ as taking information from Black Hat experts or White Hat experts, who both
go against what Google/Matt Cutts are saying.
You form your own opinion based on the information given. Google has rules, but
you do your best to stay within' that little box of Google's. After that, all information you receive should be taken on a case-by-case basis, and then if you have information available... You can say whatever is on your mind. Hence my comments and ideas. You don't want to listen to me? Fine.
Not my problem. When you spend $1000 on a 'forum' domain, and you're
only capturing 'forum' keywords, and come to a block... Don't complain. Because I told you that 'Forums' is better.
Granted, some advice from Matt Cutts are spot-on, and I'll take his advice, but sometimes... Matt Cuts holds back some information...
Any algorithm company will do this. ANY. They don't want you to cheat the system, they don't want you to think it's okay to do what you're thinking of doing... In fact, they don't really want to give you "free money." Especially when your ads are straight from their own ad services. You see where I'm going with this?
You take everything personally thinking it's an attack, when all I am doing is saying what you've said goes against legitimate information supplied by someone who is in charge of putting the information out there.
You've always make a point of telling people this and that, so to me....
Yes, it's an attack. Basically, what you're telling me is that my stats are false, and I am wrong in my research. I've been doing this for a long time, I'm not stupid.
Treat me the way you'd like to be treated, and I'll treat you that way. It's
that simple. Every time you post, and you specifically quote me... You've got
nothing but negative things to say to me.