@
Carlos you create the negativity every time you respond to someones critique about your site. You posted your site for critique and that is what you are getting. I really am confused most times when you make replies to anyone because you are always so defensive even though everyone has politely given you fixes and or great advice. You turn it around to a negative and go on about how you don't do things that way or.. well, hell I don't why you do it...lol
Well, well, well, if it isn't "Qwk86gn." You and every one that ever fought with me has never treated me with the same kind of respect that you think I have not done thus far. For every post I make, everyone seems to want to fight with me for a reason or another. I mean, look at tajhay's post - 50% of his post is so negative, that it
feels like an attack ...I mean why would someone assume so much and make it seem like my site is less than what I think it is? Why would someone go only so far to make false claims about my site? Why would someone want to hurt me so bad that he wants to pull my site into muddy controversy? This is the same exact question I had with Sheldon. A lot of the critiques that I see on this site don't really have a lot of the negativity that I'm getting. Everyone is cordial to each other, but not to me...?
My site may not be all that active at the moment, but it will be in around two weeks from now. Then into November. Here are examples of CODForums being busy:
So, whatever claims he had: Void. Whatever you guys thought: Void.
I'll go even further: MW3Blog was in the top 5 hottest stories on a popular news aggregation site...
MW4Blog did the same, earlier this year....
My next goal is to get the #1 spot, which is that big image.
Any questions?
I'm sure I'll have some mud coming my way but I just had to say it..Step down from that throne you think your on and listen when people are trying to help you. No one is dragging you into any argument but yourself Carlos.
I'm not dragging anyone into any arguement, it's those that try to drag me and my site into muddy roads. And honestly, I'm not sitting on a throne. Whoever gave you that idea needs to stop spreading that rumor.
I have to agree with the input here....listen, the term "critique" encompasses giving feedback (hopefully, constructive feedback- in that it is helpful to make changes that help you, but, not just a flame on you). I think that all the folks here did that, at least initially (though, after back and forth, it may have edged into just criticism).
I can take constructive criticism, but taj's post was not constructive. He made some claims about me and/or my site that were false. The first thing you should never do is make assumptions about a site. Ya know, every time I go into a critique thread, and I don't like the design. I make it known, but with some respect. As a constructive criticism. Taj didn't do that, he threw insults every other sentence just to make his point. Like that whole "I can do better than you," that "I'm better than you" attitude. Fine, you're an admin, taj, but don't rub your stats into my face and make it seem like you can do better than me.
ALL COD sites right now, are slow in the growth department. Hell, I'd just seen not one, not two, not three COD sites close down.
I don't think the point here is to either attack OR just give accolades to sites. Seems like you were hoping that everyone just said, "Your site is great!!"). If that is what you were hoping for, you basically have two choices for your response- ignore, or take what was stated in stride (and make changes- like it sounds like you did- as appropriate).
I'm not looking for those "your site is great!" feedback as in how you'd like to be heard, I'm looking for feedback as in, respectful criticism - constructive feedback, criticism, however you want to call it. Taj didn't do that, he just makes the feedback, then switches to saying "I can do better." And then all those other jabs at me once in a while.
Seems strange to me that the tenor of a lot of folks posting was to help you improve (in the view of the responsive posters) and this was taken as an attack on you, your site(s) and your corporate empire. I think that you should not take things as an attack, but take comments as objective observations, and incorporate changes if they make sense. Most ventures that do not take input into account (i.e., are not responsive to input or feedback) fail.
You just don't see the little sarcastic little jabs that he made in some sentences - I have seen them. I studied english extensively after people misunderstand me. Hell, it took me 3 semesters to pass a really, really hard english course. THREE.
Now, don't go passing judements about me; I'm not stupid, I'm not a retard, and I'm definitely not an idiot.
But, if you just want positive input, it does sound like you have put a lot of personal effort and desire into your forum. I hope it takes off like you want. I don't play COD, or any of the games really covered on your site (it has been too long, but, I have enjoyed me some Elder Scrolls...but, my free time is far and few between). Maybe I have missed the allure or point of your site. I hope it goes well for you.
How should I make "a lot of personal effort" and "desire" into my forum when I've already done it? Have you even read anything I just said? Do you understand that it takes a lot of time and effort to be able to bring traffic to a site like CODForums? I don't think you do!
Did you know that right now, as of this writing, it's 1:55am in California? Did you know I stayed up until 3 or 4 am in the morning just to work on my sites? Did you know that the evening of me buying CODForums I stayed up until the very next morning!? Did you!? No you didn't.