SneakyDave
Well-known member
I was reading some of the complaints from users over there. They probably don't realize how thankful they are that you didn't go with vB5, but most seem like minor issues
I would. Especially if the situation was embarrassing to you in the first place. It's our way of saying "I apologize for the inconveniences if you had any, but we have rectified the situation by switching to a new, fresh software!"I would never explain myself to my users why I use which software on my web site.
Yes, there's a need for justification - some users are afraid of change, so to alleviate any anger or any disdain to a major change like this - it's better to explain your situation than nothing. Leaving your users/customers hanging on "what's with the software change?" question... is a bad idea.What you experience is just the regular "change" situation, where the users have to adapt to an all new situation. All new things are suspect and "bad" at first. I know it is hard if you paid a lot of money and worked for weeks to get the best result possible and are proud of the result and all you hear is how bad some customers react to it.
Never mind, some angry users are completely normal in your situation. No need for any justification.
I would never explain myself to my users why I use which software on my web site.
My only suggestion would be to... "create" a new skin, based on the lighter skin you have now, to suit the "darker please" folks.@Shelley the two elements of the design we are changing because of negative feedback are the brightness of the page - we are darkening it a tad, and the fonts, which we have already changed back to good 'ol Verdana. The site is more readable, and that's important
Thanks, all, for the feedback.
The reason for this is because we are using XenForo's responsive function fix every time someone scrolls. Ideally, I only want to call this function when someone is near the threshold (meaning near the animation time, both before and after). I optimized the animations themselves, but jQuery animate function fails more times than it succeeds, so I keep calling it until it returns true. I honestly don't know how other people animate, since I just couldn't use the function very well. As a function, it seems buggy. Regardless, I might be able to find a fix for the top. Any suggestions, or javascript gurus, feel free to get in touch with me, would love to brainstorm.The laggy scrolling in firefox actually isn't as a result of the position:fixed header, but rather Javascript:
![]()
The first and last results are a ~5-10 second window of scrolling
The middle result is the same amount of time but no scrolling
And for a fair comparison, continually moving the mouse on the page for the same amount of time = <10% of the calls/time.
I said "woooooow." Out loud. Yes, out loud!Wow Stuart I just saw this thread. Congratulations! Quite a style change!!! You have some gutsTry to plow through all the usual critiques without letting them get to you. This will pass. I posted a test of our new style and reviews have been all over the map - most love it, but the haters are 5x as prolific..., others have legit feedback. That's why I'm going to release this vb3 retro style as an option. If anyone doesn't like the new site, I just route them to the retro style
http://xenforo.com/community/resources/vb-3-x-fluid-fixed.2151/
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.