yikes!Agreed, this is a needed feature, but not essential. +1
Though I like tagging, I've never had spiders crawling on them... Mind you, I had to wrestle a giant huntsman spider to the death this morning.
I was wondering that myself...I just figured you were a fan ...To be honest, I never really understood the purpose of the tagging system, all those key words should be in the posts? Correct? Why do we need them listed again within another sub-system. I use it on my site and I notice spiders crawl that list frequently. Maybe there is some value there.Having thousands of tags for every word in existence is retarded.
You simply cannot manage that.
Using tags as an adhoc faux taxonomy system is the better way to go.
Lets say you run an entertainment forum.
And you have a forum for music with subforums for Rap,Rock,Pop, etc..
And a forum for Movies, with subforums for Drama, Comedy, Action, etc...
Now the Social Network movie is coming out, its a Drama so you put it in that subforum.
But it also stars Justin Timberlake who is a pop star... do you also make a thread about it in the Pop music forum?
Maybe... im sure some would.
But you also have the option of tagging that particular thread with the words Justin Timberlake if that is a topic that you think trends on your site.
You can then create an image of Justin or simply create a link, place it somewhere on your forum, and have that link go to a list of all threads tagged with Justin Timberlake.
Why the hell did i decide to use Justin Timberlake as my friggin example ity:
Which is why you'd not do it in the legacy way .Tagging is one of those legacy features that sounded good in theory when it was originally introduced, but it never really met expectations. One thing is for sure though: Tag clouds are a great way to make a page look cluttered as hell, which is something I think the developers of Xenforo are trying desperately to avoid.
I second this suggestion. However, in my opinions, tags should be EXCLUSIVELY auto-generated (with only a backend override option), as their true purpose is just to improve searchability and SEO.I'm surprised I haven't read this yet, but a tagging system would be really great to have.
Auto-generating tags does little more then spam keywords that are in the title or content; less keywords generally do better then more keywords, and they should be words that explain a bit about the actual thread, rather then re-iterating the title or post content.I second this suggestion. However, in my opinions, tags should be EXCLUSIVELY auto-generated (with only a backend override option), as their true purpose is just to improve searchability and SEO.
Moderation system is pluggable, so you can plug tags to be moderated.Please don't bloat the software with a tagging system. It is useless unless it is strictly controlled by staff, which on large forums is impossible. Leave this up to 3rd party.
Me too.I spent a lot of time adding tags manually to threads in vBulletin. I would really like to see tags implemented and the ability to import them from vB.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.