EQnoble
Well-known member
Right right and I am not even trying to start an argument of semantics but what I was getting at was that for me to follow Star Trek as a whole.. I would watch this installment in terms of men from 22xx back in time and be aware of that through the entire movie or it wouldn't make sense to me...however in terms of film and theater yes you could could say it is mainly set in the good ole 80's and you would surely be right...but I guess I just consider it a story that happens during a temporal incursion originating in 22xx because looking at things that way while watching star trek helps make sense of some of the crazy stuff (paradoxes, anomalies, anything dealing with Q etc ) so that the story flows and makes sense.Yes they did go back in time to be there but to me if 90% of a movie is set in 1984 and only 10% is set in 22xx or whatever year, it counts as a movie set in 1984.
There was an episode of DS9 i believe, maybe a couple, that could better different timelines. One we're not sure if it was a dream/vision or not.
As far as DS9 are you talking about season 3 episodes 11 and 12 (Past Tense parts 1 & 2) where they end up in San Francisco and Sisko leads a rebellion?