I would have thought that the 'Kitchen Sink' title would have been sufficient hint that this is not a style we endorse or take seriously.looks awful.
Kier finds it awful too You can always change it to this: http://xenforo.com/community/threads/style-properties-ii-a-closer-look.3690/#post-56513
I think people just have to unlearn the habit of pushing as much information as possible in the message user info (or postbit in vB terminology).
When there are 2 kinds of postbit-that's good. It is well that you can choose between displaying postbit.I would have thought that the 'Kitchen Sink' title would have been sufficient hint that this is not a style we endorse or take seriously.
...people just have to unlearn the habit of pushing as much information as possible in the message user info (or postbit in vB terminology).
When there are 2 kinds of postbit-that's good. It is well that you can choose between displaying postbit.
Just wanted 2 versions will looked nice...
Whats the point of replicating what already exists? Why is it people are trying to turn XF into VB and VB into XF? Seriously... people need to just let go and either make the change or stick with what they use. But it must stop that people want to change products, but then have that product replicate exactly what they had before.When there are 2 kinds of postbit-that's good. It is well that you can choose between displaying postbit.
Just wanted 2 versions will looked nice...
One thing I will say about the kitchen sink style is that the "report, like, reply" buttons need to be pushed down to the same line as the bottom of the postbit. Looks horrid how it is now.
I believe it was discussed and I also believe Mike said that it's technically hard to do because you don't know the length of a post or something.Have you suggested this in the suggestions area JVCode? I think you should if you haven't as this suggestion is a good one and makes sense to have them pushed down.
I believe it was discussed and I also believe Mike said that it's technically hard to do because you don't know the length of a post or something.
To be honest this is a little over my head too, but here's what I think is the problem: with tables you can set a height, in CSS-based design you have no tables so you can't specify the height. That height is based on the variable content in a block-level element. So the signature/links will be placed below the content in a post, the content in that post will push the signature below it....I'm not a designer or nothing, but does it matter that length? the end of the postbit is the end of the postbit, no matter how long, short, fat, or thin it is. Isn't there a rule you could set for it?
That's very true.So that's what I tried to explain, the devs can't set a one-fits-all CSS.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.