Shelley
Well-known member
The difference is the Orion is not made to deliver cargo to ISS, its main design is to reach the moon. I've been doing some work with NASA and MCC21 the past couple of months and got the opportunity to fly the Orion sim. Part of that was docking with ISS, so it is capable. Even so, SpaceX will be a more cost effective solution, since it is purpose built to be supply vessel for ISS.
What worse though is that ISS is due for a reentry burn in 2020 - an extension from the original 2013 date. It isn't actually "in orbit", its on the upper edge of the atmosphere and requires periodic altitude boosts. The last one keeps it aloft until 2020. So the net of this is its all just a temporary solution to a short term problem.
Hopefully an ISS replacement will be assembled at one of the earth/moon l-points so that it can become a permanent base for earth and lunar ops. Eventually, it could become the anchor point for a space elevator between both.
Yeah, i thought it was strange (from the first link in this thread) that orion was being mentioned when i watched the live feed from pressing the link in the first post since this really had nothing to do with the thread topic so my first bunch of posts were based upon this since orion will be sitting ontp of the heavy lift rocket which as far as i know is still being developed.
I never knew it needed period boosts and suffered from orbital decay. Personally the ISS is just a waste of money, time and resources we learned nothing building it apart from sending people into low earth orbit with russia did many years before that, heck even America partially did with skylab in the 70s.
Space elevator - Can't see that being done for many years.
edit: what was the simulator like Fred? I did see a documentary sure i did where someone tested the orion simulator docking onto the ISS.