jmurrayhead
Well-known member
I strongly feel luck is not needed. This is pretty open and shut to me. Hopefully, the judge finds it to be that way, too.
California Case Update
- Thread starter Shamil
- Start date
- Status
On the contrary, if this motion gets granted, the case may well go on for another year or more.
Kim
Well-known member
Urgh!
Let's hope the judge had a great breakfast and is in a good mood for seeing the truth.
Kim
Well-known member
Dear Kim, couldn't you send good ol' home-made scrumptious breakfast for him. We all know it would help with our cause.
Good luck Ashley, Mike and Kier.
Would if I could Saeed, would if I could
Peggy
in memoriam 2016
The fact that he's let this case go one this long tells me that luck just may be needed.
jmurrayhead
Well-known member
Peggy
in memoriam 2016
MGSteve
Well-known member
I thought if it gets granted, the trial date is set for November, or is that just a first hearing or something?
Saeed
Well-known member
Fred Sherman
Well-known member
Legal minds out there, help us poor mortals.
If I think about this logically...
The judge has all of the pretrial motions and such in his possession now.
If he grants the motion today, would that mean he's unlikely to grant the summary judgement on 7 Nov?
If he rejects the motion today, it would allow the possibility of granting the summary judgement on 7 Nov?
Granting the motion today, most likely leads to trial on 29 Nov.
Rejecting the motion and the summary judgement leads to trial.
So the outcome of today is either still hope that this all goes away on 7 Nov or pretty much knowing it goes to trial.
Does logic hold or does logic blow up in the face of a convoluted legal system?
If I think about this logically...
The judge has all of the pretrial motions and such in his possession now.
If he grants the motion today, would that mean he's unlikely to grant the summary judgement on 7 Nov?
If he rejects the motion today, it would allow the possibility of granting the summary judgement on 7 Nov?
Granting the motion today, most likely leads to trial on 29 Nov.
Rejecting the motion and the summary judgement leads to trial.
So the outcome of today is either still hope that this all goes away on 7 Nov or pretty much knowing it goes to trial.
Does logic hold or does logic blow up in the face of a convoluted legal system?
F
Floris
Guest
Best of luck Mert, together with everybody that were forced to be involved in it.
MGSteve
Well-known member
Sorry, I got mixed up - granting the motion today will mean IB can add more, frankly, rubbish claims & waste even more time. - i.e. we start all over again.
Dismissing it will mean that we then need to wait until the 7th of Nov to see whether it goes to trial. (As far as I understand it)
If today's motion is granted, Plaintiff will be permitted to file a second amended complaint, alleging several new claims and naming several new defendants. Those new defendants cannot possibly be expected to mount a defence and face trial in just a few weeks, so the current November 29th trial date would likely be pushed off for many months.
If today's motion is denied, the next thing will be the hearing for Defendants' motion for summary judgement on November 7. If that motion is granted, there will be no trial on the claims stated in the first amended complaint.
If today's motion is denied, the next thing will be the hearing for Defendants' motion for summary judgement on November 7. If that motion is granted, there will be no trial on the claims stated in the first amended complaint.
F
Floris
Guest
meh <sh1tty feelings>
Daniel Thomann
Active member
- Status