Digital Doctor
Well-known member
Built in Windows Unzip does give me an error.BuiltIn Windows Explorer says Unspecified Error
Built in Windows Unzip does give me an error.BuiltIn Windows Explorer says Unspecified Error
Now Windows + Winrar work.I went ahead and repackaged with another tool, just to be on the safe side.
I asked before...
Why is Mert a defendant? I assume it's the same Mert that posts here?
I asked before...
Why is Mert a defendant? I assume it's the same Mert that posts here?
Nothing, I think they went after both XenForo and a few individuals though..But what's vBSEO got to do with XenForo?
Not according to the most recent documents.AFAIK, Ashley, Mike and Kier has always been represented by Pamela.
I'm totally speechless.and the agreement was likely to simply shutter XF in return from dropping the case.
Speculation !and the agreement was likely to simply shutter XF in return from dropping the case.
Speculation !
Please say it's not true.
this the most retarded legal document I've ever read. Lawyers don't bend over backwards, they bend their clients over. Everyone knows that. Also fire is the best disinfectant....Sunlight is the best disinfectant. The simplest and best way for the Court to see for itself the falsity of the picture painted by Defendants...
...October 1, 2012. Defendants file this Motion on the very same day that
Plaintiffs' counsel sends the requested draft amendment.
Conclusion. The filing of this Motion came after months of obstruction and
delay by Defendants and their counsel. It came just when Plaintiff was bending
over backwards to accommodate Defendants despite their bad faith conduct, just to
make sure the case moved along...
...For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion should be denied.
Furthermore, Defendants and their counsel should be sanctioned in the amount of
$16,800 and the discovery cut-off should be extended one month from November
13, 2012 until December 13, 2012. Moreover, Plaintiff should be allowed to file
amended witness and/or exhibit lists by December 20, 2012 (after the current
deadline of November 13, 2012), should that discovery provide new witnesses or
exhibits that Plaintiff seeks to introduce at trial...
Not according to the most recent documents.
Anyone with their eyes open around June knew something had changed and that there had to be some type of settlement being discussed. What I observe leads me to believe the weight of the case on their personal lives is greater than the value of XF to them and the agreement was likely to simply shutter XF in return from dropping the case.
Who can really blame them? its not like you can say they made a quick buck and disappeared. XF is probably a loss for them at this point.
If thats a deal they can cut, then go for it.
So there's a very good chance a deal has already been made and that IB own XF now?
I know nobody cares, but if that's the case, hell, I'm not touching online script communities ever anymore.So there's a very good chance a deal has already been made and that IB own XF now?
So there's a very good chance a deal has already been made and that IB own XF now?
Do we know what all happened?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.