EQnoble
Well-known member
See here is the real problem with things here...there is so many groups dedicated to the safety of that specific group that it is not easily managed to establish a single standard that can be universal so it can be itemized and taxed and insured properly.
Amoungst the isssues...
In the end it boils down to....doing things "for the people" isn't really "free" nowadays after all.
Amoungst the isssues...
- People sue over everything...even if they have to fabricate evidence. These people are scum. They are the reason we have this problem. Legit attemps at recourse say because you didn't break up 2 inches of ice on the sidewalk in front of your house and someone breaks a bone...yeah your at fault...but the lack of shame and or the absence of pride amoung countless people in this great place ruin it for a whole lot of people. @Short_answer == Selfishness: Greed;
- The establishments must comply with standards set by many regulatory groups in order to attain proper insurance so if sued insurance can handle a payout if necessary under certain terms derived from the actual policy. @Short_answer == Monetary needs;
- AIDS HPV and countless other diseases are transferred with ease through blood and other means and a sore or open wound could easily start a small epidemic at a time when there is nice weather and more people likely to be barefooted especially children. Heath standards groups set a precedent by which an enforcement procedure through all the chains involved that boils down to the owner of said establishment being responsible for the fees ( and in the case of giving some ones child aids you will probably lose everything you have. ) and no sanely run insurance underwriter would consider giving a policy to lets say a gas station that covered something of this nature due to non enforcement of "safe" footwear policies established by some safety group. The way these policies were set into motion in the first place is beyond me but that is not the point. There is also some people scorn and don't care if they spread a disease they have and will not take the proper precautions that a responsible person would. @Short_answer == Health: General lack of empathy;
- The store owner needs to follow the path of least resistance to assure solid returns on all of his or her investments. Complying with policies and paying the smallest amount of overhead monthly is what it's all about and for a business owner there is often little to gain by going against the grain for the good people when the bad ones will pervert the system and pillage when possible. @Short_answer == free will cost you;
- For every decent person who would take responsibility for their own choice of footwear and subsequent accidental incidents, there is probably 3 or 4 that would take advantage of the situation. @Short_answer == My experience;
In the end it boils down to....doing things "for the people" isn't really "free" nowadays after all.