I always thought the writing on 2.5 was clever and catered to a simple premise. The characters seemed to flow well together and Charlie could always pull it off because, well, let's face it, he was basically playing himself.
Of course the ratings were high the first episode. People who like the show genuinely want it to continue to be the same style and succeed. But, frankly, I thought the first episode was flat, poorly written, and the acting weak. It didn't even seem like the regular actors were flowing well together and the dialog seemed totally contrived. Almost like actors seeing their fate in the hate script of Charlie Sheen. For example, I never used to hear the laugh track as I used to laugh with it. I kept hearing it all episode as if it was an unfunny comedian dying on stage. Regarding Ashton, I thought he did a decent job. I wouldn't fault the problems I see with him.
I always enjoyed the show. It was simple.....it was relate-able....hell, it was even fun to watch episodes I had even seen before. Though I dvd'rd the show and was hoping for the best, frankly I just found myself cringing. If that show was a pilot it would be done. I'm guessing, like myself, people will continue to try and give it a chance in the hopes it starts getting better. But, they can't expect people to hold on hopes for too long.
I also watched the roast and thought there were funny parts to it.... some even hilarious....though I really think you have to be very careful around Mike T...that boy is just a whisper away from going off. It was funny to watch the comedians balance between joking with him and running for the hills. What's her name was funny asking for the interpreter.
It definitely seemed like Charlie was "winning" this week. From his roast, to his award show comments wishing the show well, his genuine reflection on his recent behavior, and his $100mil settlement, things seem to going right again. Let's see if he can stay off the "Crazy Train".
But, I'm afraid 2.5 men might have jumped on board at the last station.