That is what IPS is doing with their monthly updates. Each month they release bug fixes and new changes/updates monthly. That way you know the software is being worked on, bugs are being fixed, and ultimately it feels like you are getting something for your money. The devs are constantly posting on their own forums. This helps the end users feel like there is life too their product and production is moving forward.I think holding off improvements and new features for 3 years is an issue. Small improvements every 3 to 6 months would go a long way towards making people feel like XF is improving and not MIA.
I think holding off improvements and new features for 3 years is an issue. Small improvements every 3 to 6 months would go a long way towards making people feel like XF is improving and not MIA.
That works fine in a cloud environment, not so much a self-hosted one with only a part-time sysadmin. Quarterly would be quite enough. So I'm with @cdub's suggestion of every 3-6 months, which is kind of the current cadence for third level updates.That is what IPS is doing with their monthly updates. Each month they release bug fixes and new changes/updates monthly. That way you know the software is being worked on, bugs are being fixed, and ultimately it feels like you are getting something for your money. The devs are constantly posting on their own forums. This helps the end users feel like there is life too their product and production is moving forward.
It's funny because vBulletin do theirs monthly.That works fine in a cloud environment, not so much a self-hosted one with only a part-time sysadmin. Quarterly would be quite enough. So I'm with @cdub's suggestion of every 3-6 months, which is kind of the current cadence for third level updates.
Well let’s hope 2.3 is almost as ground breaking and innovative as the green style.I still say april 1st.
why? Because of what they did with the green style last year.
And how many smaller sites actually install every update? Seems like a lot of work for a hobby site like mine. And a higher risk of breaking s***.It's funny because vBulletin do theirs monthly.
Which is an argument for less frequent updates to be sure. That said, I have never had a bad experience with an XF update, even in the days when I had to use FTP to do them (the site has been running Xenforo since 2014). There's been a couple times where they did a "Patch 1" release of an update shortly after the original update but I tend to wait a few days and test in my dev anyhow so that's not a big deal. And with the update feature, having to re-run an update for a follow-up patch isn't as big a deal as it used to be with FTP updates.I mean the guys here at XF could do monthly updates but all i see is complete boilovers that will produce bugs and make it less stable.
I think holding off improvements and new features for 3 years is an issue. Small improvements every 3 to 6 months would go a long way towards making people feel like XF is improving and not MIA.
There was an official post (not an announcement) that explained the previous delays, there have also been smaller posts by Chris every so often.My biggest worry is lack of communication, as it sounded like we were going to hear about 2.3 imminently - then all quiet. Just an official post in a little detail would have alleviated a lot of concerns, but now we have a 58 page thread.
Kier stated the first HYS's would be published around july/august of 2022. A 6 month delay is quite something.
I guess XF should stick to never publish an ETA![]()
It was an Estimated Time of Arrival rather than a promise. That said I thought every software developer in the world knew that publishing an ETA guarantees a delivery way beyond the intended dateAgree, never make a promise if you can't keep it.
You need to work out the difference between a promise and a time line deadline.Should be in "upcoming weeks"
Agree, never make a promise if you can't keep it.
If it was a joke then this whole thread is a joke. Just like your attitude is.Good grief!
The green style, as you refer to it, was an April fools joke, has not been changed, and is unrelated to any future release.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.