Right, they don't make long posts, and I doubt many of them will be hanging out on our forums any time soon, writing long or short posts, on desktop or mobile. I'm doubtful that the "right tools" that everyone keeps referring to is, whatever exactly they might be, are going to bring them in, because they already have those tools on TikTok and Twitter, etc., and why are they going to spend their time making 20 word posts on Joe Blow's forum when they'd rather post to a potential audience of millions, because they're all narcissists in the making.Not even that, I don't know anyone, not even the people a decade or more younger than me who are mobile first, and would admit to liking it for writing long posts - because they don't make long posts.
I just wish XF would release another update and better communication. We're now well into March and still nothing since the last update from a developer late last year, which isn't a good sign. The fact that many reported and confirmed bugs aren't getting quashed is especially telling.
Thank you for this communication masterclass @ChrisD.We’re still working.
Sadly, people expect you to work and be their best friend, therapist and apparently their emotional support animal while they have a cognitive breakdown over the impending doom of XenForo as a company /s.We’re still working.
Sadly, people expect you to work and be their best friend, therapist and apparently their emotional support animal while they have a cognitive breakdown over the impending doom of XenForo as a company /s.
...I also said they want Chris and Kier to be emotional support animals![]()
Communication Strategies For Ideal Software Development
The best development partners? Strong communicators. Because you need effective communication when it comes to technical hurdles and production delays.envylabs.com
I have been neutral with this thread since the beginning. But I think we can all agree that effective communication could be important long term with Xenforo and it’s user base. Acting like people need a therapist is a bit unfair tbh.
I think it's clear to everyone except the fanbois that XF have several clear problems, causing reputational issues. XF have acknowledged them, but doing nothing about some of them. Either because they're unable to or don't wish to? Further exasperating the reputation and eroding customer loyalty.Well sure, but they did say just a few months ago that they are still working hard on 2.3, but no ETA on release date. So we do know where they are at.. (working).
And at the same time we're also told that they do not expect it to impact upgrades which begs the question somewhat of what it could possibly be.We're also told that 2.3 will have a significant change that much of 2022 was spend developing
Honestly.. I don't care that much about 2.3.... there are several bugs in the current version that needs resolution, many of which deal with the editor itself.Well sure, but they did say just a few months ago that they are still working hard on 2.3, but no ETA on release date. So we do know where they are at.. (working).
So I don't really expect to hear much until the HYS start. And I don't expect them to announce any "estimates" either, based on the previous time they did that (and failed to meet said "deadline").
OTOH something like replacing the editor is more likely to happen in a 2.x release than a 2.2.x release since it is much more involved than changing a few lines of code like a more typical bug fix. But, yeah, bug fixes are of more interest to me than new features. I won't complain if we get a couple more maintenance releases for 2.2 before 2.3 becomes reality.Honestly.. I don't care that much about 2.3.... there are several bugs in the current version that needs resolution, many of which deal with the editor itself.
2.3 has been in active development for quite some time and we expect to start running HYS threads in the coming weeks.
Not talking about "replacing" the editor.. there is a newer version of the base editor out that is NOT utilized. If it fixes many of the issues, it CAN be rolled into a point release.OTOH something like replacing the editor is more likely to happen in a 2.x release than a 2.2.x release since it is much more involved than changing a few lines of code like a more typical bug fix.
Later versions of the editor contained bugs that probably stopped deployment. Whether that's still the case for the latest version I can't say but I'd like to think part of the delay to 2.3 is due to the editor being completely replaced.Not talking about "replacing" the editor.. there is a newer version of the base editor out that is NOT utilized.
Well, there actually has been some mention of replacing the editor - I think it was Chris who said he/they would like to (although it wouldn't be soon, so no, not likely in 2.3) - so I expect that's what will eventually happen. But yeah, maybe the current one will get an upgrade before that happens.Not talking about "replacing" the editor.. there is a newer version of the base editor out that is NOT utilized. If it fixes many of the issues, it CAN be rolled into a point release.
Stop with your trolling.If so, you got WAY more issues than a downloaded archived set of files that should only be extracted on the destination.
That's good.We’re still working.
Sounds like a demand you want that may not be met.Not talking about "replacing" the editor.. there is a newer version of the base editor out that is NOT utilized. If it fixes many of the issues, it CAN be rolled into a point release.
Unless there are drastic changes, upgrading the editor could be rolled into a x.y.Z release. The core is already there. It's not like going from Redactor.Well, there actually has been some mention of replacing the editor - I think it was Chris who said he/they would like to (although it wouldn't be soon, so no, not likely in 2.3) - so I expect that's what will eventually happen. But yeah, maybe the current one will get an upgrade before that happens.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.