WYSIWYG editor in Pages

Shanj

Well-known member
Logician's templates let me edit the page with WYSWYG.
I can also enable my mods to edit like that.
Can these Pages do that? Much faster and easier for simple text + pics stuff.

Also I want some Pages access permissions by usergroup or several.
Even better for my homepage I want PARTS of the page per usergroup! To give links to their forums and info guide pages, section to have their own colour theme and symbol.
Could be done by a link on the central page for each usergroup but ... nicer if it's appears like just one.
 
Upvote 27
Well given that pages are not user generated and I know HTML very well then it doesn't bother me. I see your point. However, as an aside.... bbcode is an example of non html syntax that is used within a wysiwyg. Maybe there is a way round this but if not its no big deal for me. I actually prefer more control but admit for some static pages I have in mind a wysiwyg would be speedier.
 
Sorry I should have been clearer. The mod I use already lets a permitted editpor use bbcode. Just like a forum message - so it's like the central page content acts like clicking Reply on an existing message in a forum.

Again if you're an html savvy admin and you want only yourself to edit pages the current Pages are fine.
But if you are either not html skilled or you have mods who you want to be editors who are not htrml skilled, this feature is wonderful.

I use it as well for notes pages - for staff to collaborate on.
 
...learn HTML. :D

I'm fine with html but it's slower than bbcode and my main role is not as webdesigner but as a community leader. My time is highly pressured as I run several communities both online and offline, on a local, regional, national and international level. Plus I publish books, edit others' writing, renovate properties, etc etc etc. I don't expect my routine everyday maintenance on a forum to involve html. Config, template changes, yes; even setting up a page - but quick updates on a daily or weekly basis - no.
I don't expect to have to use html in a forum message or PC message - same kind of thing.

Plus I don't want my choice of moderators (editors) to b e limited by who can do html. My moderators on one board are highly skilled professionals. They are appointed because of their skills in organising and supporting people. html has little to do with that and I#d lose a lot of talent and experience if I were limited to html skilled moderators.

That's just me individually. Looking more widely I don't see why a forum admin should be required to know html. Once they've got a forum up and runming, perhaps paying a designer to set up a template theme for them, they shouldn't need to use it. Running a forum is a social skill not a webdesign one.
 
That's just me individually. Looking more widely I don't see why a forum admin should be required to know html. Once they've got a forum up and runming, perhaps paying a designer to set up a template theme for them, they shouldn't need to use it. Running a forum is a social skill not a webdesign one.
I disagree, I happen to think that any serious forum admin should at least be familiar with basic HTML and PHP (and possibly SQL), but that's just me. :)

I can see where a WYSIWYG editor would be useful for those who don't know HTML, but I don't think the user-friendly-editor approach is what Kier and Mike are looking for with Pages. :)
 
I disagree, I happen to think that any serious forum admin should at least be familiar with basic HTML and PHP (and possibly SQL), but that's just me. :)

I can see where a WYSIWYG editor would be useful for those who don't know HTML, but I don't think the user-friendly-editor approach is what Kier and Mike are looking for with Pages. :)

Erik I've survived as forum admin just fine with html, tweak php (comment out/ replace as instructed) and no knowledge of SQL at all. I've come across forum admins with flourishing boards worth less coding knowledge than me.

If K&M aren't aiming at user friendly they're not the guys I thought they were! On VB they created user friendly and even more here. Cutting edge in fact on user friendly.

Their whole genius is about spanning the joy of coders creating mods, admins who can code - right the way over to the point and click follow instructions type of admin. The forum is for some just a tool for creating a community, not an end in itself.
 
Right, but based on K&M's responses I think the intent of the Pages feature was something simple that would allow you to add custom HTML/code into the node tree, not a full content editor or anything, which would function more like a CMS. :)
 
Right, but based on K&M's responses I think the intent of the Pages feature was something simple that would allow you to add custom HTML/code into the node tree, not a full content editor or anything, which would function more like a CMS. :)

I think you're right about the original intention. But now there is a clear request arising for wyswyg bbcode it's different - they're cool on requests. I did see a post back there from one of them obviouisly considering it. Said it would clash with the integrated design of the page. I replied that it was like having the ability to put stuff in a forum Reply box - that doesn't affect the rest of the page design. So if the main page content could be enabled to be like a big forum message ....

... no answer on that one yet but they'll get to it.
 
I disagree, I happen to think that any serious forum admin should at least be familiar with basic HTML and PHP (and possibly SQL), but that's just me. :)

I know basic HTML, but have no clue whatsoever on PHP or MYSQL. I am a serious forum admin on a seriously successful (vB 3.8 powered) website in The Netherlands. Apparently, one of the most successful vB websites in The Netherlands :). I am glad people like XenForo Ltd. are HTML/PHP/MYSQL specialists and provide me with a platform where I can do my job, without having to worry about any PHP/MYSQL stuff.

I can see where a WYSIWYG editor would be useful for those who don't know HTML, but I don't think the user-friendly-editor approach is what Kier and Mike are looking for with Pages. :)

Then this reinforces my serious need of a solution that does not require me to know anything about HTML. I need...

Right, but based on K&M's responses I think the intent of the Pages feature was something simple that would allow you to add custom HTML/code into the node tree, not a full content editor or anything, which would function more like a CMS. :)

... indeed.
 
Any news on the bbcode editor? I've been away in a tent for ages!
and the bbcode editor thing is the most important thing I want to be able to switch to XF
 
But I honestly don't think people need this. Just write your page as you would normally make a html page, and paste the html code into it. And you're done.

I disagree. Since CMS products came to the market I almost never had the need to know HTML anymore. I think the days that you had to know/learn HTML just to be able to easily publish your pages are really over, aren't they? There is a reason why solutions like Wordpress have become so popular. It feels like a step backwards for me that I need to know HTML or at least use HTML code to be able to construct the simplest of pages in XenForo. For me this feel like being back in 1997 (!) when I had to create my first ever then-so-called-'Homepage' by learning HTML structure/codes.

Really, I don't even have a HTML editor installed on my PC anymore since years. Even as a forum-administrator I simply do not need it anymore: I am able to run/manage my vBulletin 3.8 powered website perfectly without any knowledge of HTML. That's why it's quite remarkable to me that with the ever-so-userfriendly XenForo it is apparently needed to know HTML (or use such an editor) to construct just simple pages with text and some graphics for instance. This makes the whole Pages-functionality almost unusable for me actually...
 
Having a text editor is not going to change the fact that you'll need to use HTML in the page.
I used Logician's webtemplates add-on with my vB, which requires use of HTML, also, so I kept my HTML editor around even though I do know more than a little HTML, The fact that they have added this page feature so that we don't need an add-on is quite intuitive, IMO.
 
For the most part what is the difference between:
 
Code:
[b] and <b>/<strong>, [I] and <em>/<i>, [U] and <u>?
If you're going to be dependent on BBCode, you're going to be severely limiting your pages, as you won't be able to do much more then format and possible align certain things.
 
The fact that they have added this page feature so that we don't need an add-on is quite intuitive, IMO.

Well... as a non-HTML webuser/admin myself I think it would be more 'intuitive' if we are able to construct those Pages the same way as we can construct Postings. I always hated it with a passion that in vBulletin for example we could NOT create Notices without using HTML: http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/show...=1731129&highlight=bbcode+notices#post1731129 ... and that gave me big headaches. There may be technical reasons and all, but I am the enduser. As an admin-enduser it really is counter-productive to be forced to use HTML just to create your simple Notices! (which is otherwise a fantastic system bytheway) I wonder if I feel the same when using the Pages functionality overhere.

One can expect (to a certain extend nowadays) that forum admins know basic HTML, but that is just not always the case anymore. Being used to the excellent WYSIWYG editors of vBulletin, Wordpress and systems alike, my knowledge and experience with HTML became lesser and lesser. And I can't say I regret it...
 
Only being able to use BB Code would severely restrict how you could display content.

You would need to create new BB Code to be able to wrap text around images, display tables, etc.
 
What would you like for them to change, Grover? Adding a WYSIWYG editor is not going to give you the code needed to construct colums, rows, etc that are often needed in static pages.You still need HTML.
This page feature is meant to be used to create static (html) pages for your site, so that you don't need off-forum static pages. That is its purpose.
 
Only being able to use BB Code would severely restrict how you could display content.

Yes, I understand that. Isn't it technically possible maybe to provide us with both, so people who need HTML can use that and people who want a WYSIWYG editor just like in Postings can use that?
 
Yes I agree (Peggy) that the inclusion of Pages in XF is fantastic. That's why I'm so keen to add in the missing bit to make them really usable. Otherwise they are going to be of very limited use. I'm reminded of the vb Groups feature which was a great idea but never listened to urgent requests to link the Groups to forums so the feature withered.
Having pages that have the forum header, footer, side menu of links, usergroup permissions, displayed in the forum hierarchy, is just FANTASTIC.

Logician's page templates have been consistently a top favourite mod on vb.org and may even have inspired Paqges here. Having worked with Logician's page templates for a couple of years which DO have an optional bbcode editor you can use right on the page itself - I know it's still necessary to use html if you want anything beyond the basic in a page. Logician's mod lets you choose which you need.
But you can do quite a lot with the kind of basics a bbcode editor does.

So if you want just one column of text with paragraphs, alignment, font size, colour, italic, bold, smilies, inserted links, and graphics incl. alignment, you can do that with the bbcode editor. That's actually a lot!
Just like writing a forum message except you click a link on the page to open the editor, which you can only do if you're in a usergroup permitted to edit that particular page. Note permission per page not all pages.

Any more like tables - columns, bordered boxes, designated sections etc you have to do with html.
But I do have pages I create the table in html and the WYSWYG editor can be used to update text or graphics. That is wonderfully easy and quick for me and my mods do not need html to add notes to update the page. If the page has table layout and I want them to add notes to a particular table cell I put an alert in, in small italics, alerting them to how to add their notes. As long as they only ADD stuff to existing text, or edit their own text, there is no problem.
I can make very fast updates myself in seconds - which means because it's so quick and easy I am much more likely to do it! So I don't have these pages hanging around going stale with out of date stuff. Yes I could do it in html but that means go and open my html editor, return to the page, copy/paste a section of page over into my html editor, edit the bits I want, then copy/paste it back into the admincp page. Then check in user view it's tuurn ed out the way I want. Alternatively I can type out all those html brackets by hand - no thanks.

Much much more user friendly to just use the facility that I'm using right now - the WYSWYG editor we use for messages.

Now Floris earlier described a solution using custom dir tinymce - I didn't understand it but Floris generally knows his coding so I'm sure it's a runner. Except you have to be better than me to implement it. Here's the post.
http://xenforo.com/community/threads/pages.489/page-7#post-42995

Then Kier said
The biggest obstacle to adding a WYSIWYG editor to the Pages editor is the fact that it would block your ability to use XenForo template syntax within the page, which rather completely defeats the point of the system, in my opinion.
I confess I don't understand that either.
What would I be unable to do? Use bits of the forum code? In Logician's templates I can put
Welcome $user
or whatever that vbcode is I forget exactly, and the user sees their username on the page. Is that the kind of thing you mean WYSWYG would block Kier?

It doesn't conflict on Logician's templates. I've had both on one page. I have to put the bits of vbcode in at admincp/ html level but it's also possible to do simple quick update edits using the WYSWYG - and permitting my mods to do that too.

However if XF is different in this case so we can't have both WYSWYG and XF template syntax on the same page, I think I'd like the choice please on what is important to me on that particular page. There are lots of Pages I wouldn't need the template syntax in my content if I've understood rightly what that is.
A note in admincp when you're setting the page up -
"You can either simply manage a Page in html, or enable a WYSWYG editor. A combi approach is to set up the layout in html and then enable WYSWYG for quick update edits .
Note you cannot have WYSWYG editing if you want to include XF template syntax in that Page e.g. {example}."

Please please WYSWYG - I know some don't want it but some of us DO.

Re-reading this thread which I have right from the beginning over 11 pages, that is abundantly clear.
Choice please?
 
Top Bottom