Hi, I had the same situation. Finally it self-resolved (I changed nothing!) and group update worked...
Now all the 1100 users are shown on the map.
User map [Deleted]
- Thread starter CrispinP
- Start date
Now all the 1100 users are shown on the map.
PumpinIron
Well-known member
I guess I'll have to keep trying the mass update and hoping it eventually works and doesn't give me that 500 server error.
Same problem. Any solution proposals?
Floyd R Turbo
Well-known member
Floyd R Turbo
Well-known member
PumpinIron
Well-known member
What's the other main one? Now that this add-on is no longer supported, I need to look for something that will work with XF2.
Floyd R Turbo
Well-known member
It's by XFA but it doesn't have many of the nice features that this one has, but they'll add them for $$$$. If I just had this addon tweaked for the additional features that I wanted (basically merging both feature sets together) it would cost less. I offered but he is rather busy. Hopefully it will either happen (the tweaks) or he will give it up....
RobinHood
Well-known member
Come on Ozzy, you can't say that the same as the developer deleting it.
The message is posted against that users avatar. It looks like they're the ones that posted it, when in reality of was the automated cleaning system.
I'm not against the system and you're right in that people perhaps shouldn't be buying from sellers that haven't been active in a certain period of time, but it's definitely not clear what's actually happening and why it was deleted, especially to a member who doesn't visit XF.com that often.
The message is posted against that users avatar. It looks like they're the ones that posted it, when in reality of was the automated cleaning system.
I'm not against the system and you're right in that people perhaps shouldn't be buying from sellers that haven't been active in a certain period of time, but it's definitely not clear what's actually happening and why it was deleted, especially to a member who doesn't visit XF.com that often.
This is the second time in two days the way delete messages on resources are made has been brought up.
We’ve had the housekeeping process in place for over two years, albeit manual at first, but the end result has always been the same - the delete message being by the Resource author.
Despite the behaviour being the same for so long, people are suddenly complaining about it as if it’s something new
We’ve had the housekeeping process in place for over two years, albeit manual at first, but the end result has always been the same - the delete message being by the Resource author.
Despite the behaviour being the same for so long, people are suddenly complaining about it as if it’s something new
Ozzy47
Well-known member
This is the second time in two days the way delete messages on resources are made has been brought up.
We’ve had the housekeeping process in place for over two years, albeit manual at first, but the end result has always been the same - the delete message being by the Resource author.
Despite the behaviour being the same for so long, people are suddenly complaining about it as if it’s something new
Exactly, it just happend to be a couple of well liked addons it happened to recently. Which it would not have happened if the developers supported their addons properly on here.
RobinHood
Well-known member
Yeah, sorry, I think I mentioned it, or something in Son's thread. I didn't log back in soon enough to see any replies if there were any though and only saw that my post was deleted when I logged in tonight.
For me it's because it happened at all on a very large and popular plugin. That probably wasn't an issues as much over the last two years on because more active developers would continue to login in regularly. But Son's gallery is a massive plugin, sales of his previous massive V1 plugin I'm sure had slowed, and it has taken a long time to develop V2 of the gallery, as it has taken a long time to roll out XF V2.0 and 2.1. So it was just surprising to see it deleted out of the blue and have it look like Son had deleted it and abandoned the plugin with no explanation.
Was he actually abandoning it? Was it deleted because he gave on on XF2? Was there another reason? It's not beyond comprehension. The ambiguity wasn't good, that's all.
This one was the second time it happened in a few days, so it just caught me off guard and I wanted to voice that it is confusing that the XF deletion against the users avatar is confusing. I wasn't aware of the suggestion thread Ozzy, thanks for pointing it out.
For me it's because it happened at all on a very large and popular plugin. That probably wasn't an issues as much over the last two years on because more active developers would continue to login in regularly. But Son's gallery is a massive plugin, sales of his previous massive V1 plugin I'm sure had slowed, and it has taken a long time to develop V2 of the gallery, as it has taken a long time to roll out XF V2.0 and 2.1. So it was just surprising to see it deleted out of the blue and have it look like Son had deleted it and abandoned the plugin with no explanation.
Was he actually abandoning it? Was it deleted because he gave on on XF2? Was there another reason? It's not beyond comprehension. The ambiguity wasn't good, that's all.
This one was the second time it happened in a few days, so it just caught me off guard and I wanted to voice that it is confusing that the XF deletion against the users avatar is confusing. I wasn't aware of the suggestion thread Ozzy, thanks for pointing it out.
