So, you're calling disgruntled customers dissidents?For IB, it's 2 less dissidents to deal with.
OK. Too strong of a word and used in the wrong context.So, you're calling disgruntled customers dissidents?
While I understand your morale and point, I myself wouldn't give a vB license to anyone.. not because I am being mean, but if I am going to help someone out like a non-profit that can't afford a license, then I would buy them a xF license.
Using your example, in my opinion... the food (vB) is already spoiled, so why give that away?
They may not really care now, but do you think they will stop at vB 4.0? Don't you think they will want to sell all the license owners an 'upgrade' to vB 5.0 or some other features or apps?
With vB having +/- 130,000 licenses out there every one that is 'canceled' without the ability to renew or sell will hurt and will make they earn your business if they ever want it again..
To kyrgyz: You are correct time will and has already started sorting it out, but that shouldn't stop people from canceling their account.. no harm in helping sort it our faster..
Jamie
Like I said, I agree with you guys in terms of sending a message out there.
But maybe you should be helping then by giving someone a XF license I mean someone out there is probably reading this thinking why? I can't afford one and could've used it, yet alone be able to buy XF or any other license too.
I've been there I know what it's like, which is why I moved here. But I think canceling has a purpose, but could be used for a better purpose.
I agree on that. The rest doesn't make sense to me as vB license can be transfered. As far as sending a big message goes, it's a bit too late. At this point this act is more of a "getting even" nature. I don't see positivity in it, only "hatred", imho.When you have people migrating to another software because yours has been proven to be flawed and they ask you to terminate their licenses without refund (it isn't even possible with the current licensing agreement), vBulletin Solutions cannot claim all these people use their software - it would be misleading the customer AKA false-advertisement.
Try looking at it this way:The rest doesn't make sense to me...
What would the point be in transferring a license? Your post is non-sequitur post.I agree on that. The rest doesn't make sense to me as vB license can be transfered. As far as sending a big message goes, it's a bit too late. At this point this act is more of a "getting even" nature. I don't see positivity in it, only "hatred", imho.
Look at it this way. When you're an active customer paying your dues, you and others generate revenue. If you take yourself and others out of the equation, you kill any monetary revenue from that moment onward. Only the past revenue is there to fund them, once the money finishes, what will they do?It's an interesting idea, but to be realistic things do change. It is possible that my vb licenses could end up being the leftovers of a closed company, or they may be the components of a new future relationship. Take a vb license completely out of circulation does seem like a way to cripple a company, but you were already a significant customer before you made the extra effort to cancel your license.
If things go as expected, IB will see that vb admin logins are reducing. This may potentially lead to a conclusion that active vbulletin licenses are progressively being used less.
In other words, you won't be able to "share the love" now that your license is cancelled.
That logic would work with physical objects, not virtual licence numbers (wich cost nothing to generate, dont require algorythms to be generated, and are infinite).Licences not used have the exact same effect. This does not hurt IB at all, while refunds take money out their coffers (that you could spend to invest in another board, or buy a buddy another board, wich would be much more productive actions than pulling childish tantrums like this).
There are over 100.000 licences out there. The biggest effect the new pricing wouldve had is hugely increase the used market size, thereby reducing new licence sales. If youre not transferring your used licence, keeping it or selling it, rest assured one will still be bought from the next seller.
The used market is what hurts IB, especially sale of v4 licences (since no revenue or fee will go to IB till v5 is out and IF users DO upgrade). People who go after used licences are strongly after vB, and actions like this would not pry them away from it.
Cancelling licences is just getting them suspended, thats all. Nothing new. You could just flame staff in private for the same effect if you want it the harder, more heroic way it would just take more time and test their patience till they break, since they probably are instructed to be patient with highly negative people).
So its pretty stupid of those people. I see fighting for the biggest, craziest fanboy leaderboard has gotten fiercer.
I wonder who will first think of writing "vbulletin sucks" with smoke in the sky, parachute jump as a group forming the XF initials, hanging xenforo logo/Kier photos in their marriage celebrations, tatooing brogan's face in their chests...
Nothing would surprise me anymore. People like this are ones that would easily misbehave and troll the customer forum just to rub their own ego and display themselves to the world as oppressed martyrs.
Reread your own post:What would the point be in transferring a license? Your post is non-sequitur post.
The same results can be achieved by transferring a license. vB cannot claim some big corporation is using its software as ownership changes when license is transfered. Still non-sequitur?If these people asked for their licenses to also be terminated, it sends a big message to vBulletin Solutions. In effect, they cannot advertise that your community uses their software, they cannot claim fortune 500 companies use their software, or any large group that has a big name or big statistics.
Sending a message is all good. Trying to sink vB because your business suffered is understandable. That's what I call "getting even". Beyond that I just don't see logic in it. Most businesses will try to recoup money and reinvest it if the assets they are trying to get rid of have some value. Clearly vB can be sold for some $$.I don't see it as getting even. The history of the business industry doesn't see it as getting even, so I really can't comprehend where you're getting at.
While I admire what Michael & Shelley did, I could not afford to do it. So I am in the process of selling mine so I can afford to purchase a second copy of XF. If I didn't sell, I can't make that purchase.
Minimal difference at best. You still retain an active customer. You may lose a "big name", but you retain the income for that license #.Reread your own post:
The same results can be achieved by transferring a license. vB cannot claim some big corporation is using its software as ownership changes when license is transfered. Get it?
Most businesses will try to recoup money and reinvest it if the product they are trying to get rid of has some value. Clearly vB can be sold for some $$. If you can't understand that, reread Elizabeth's commonsense post above. Maybe "getting even" is too strong of a word. But that's the way I see it.
Look at it this way. When you're an active customer paying your dues, you and others generate revenue. If you take yourself and others out of the equation, you kill any monetary revenue from that moment onward. Only the past revenue is there to fund them, once the money finishes, what will they do?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.