It optimizes any image that you upload on your forum. This includes private conversations that you have with your forum members.It looks like these larger images are not attached to posts but in conversations. Does this add-on optimize attachments in all content types or just posts?
Default optimizations are pretty good for most forum, the only change I made is to switch from O1 to O3, it may take a little bit longer and consume more CPU usage (more compress). There is an option to compress every images uploaded prior to add-on installation, should be in Rebuild.Hi all,
Just purchased this... Just one or two quick questions....
1. Any suggested quality settings for each of the different optimisation options at all please?? obviously would like to optimise ass much as i could, however dont want too much loss on the resultant images! Is there anywhere i can upload pic and get a display of what it would look like for each optimisation level at all??
2. Does this allow just single files, or does it just go back through and do everything historical? a little more info on how to use it would be appreciated to it's best would be appreciated please?
Am hoping to use Resmush.it, however happy to use another if it gets better results. I have far too many pics to use Kraken.io as it would cost lots!
Cheers!
Many thanksDefault optimizations are pretty good for most forum, the only change I made is to switch from O1 to O3, it may take a little bit longer and consume more CPU usage (more compress). There is an option to compress every images uploaded prior to add-on installation, should be in Rebuild.
I don't think it does or reMush doesn't compress as good as the other 3 so the size will be larger so I doesn't trigger the process. The only time I active reMush is for bmp.Question - Doers this really work it's way through the available providers??
I ask because if i have both Jpegoptim and reSmush.it enabled, it only EVER checks with Jpegoptim.... it doesnt LOOK to go anywhere near reSmush.it......
Forget about guetzli, it is interesting as a scientific research project but unusable for anything productive.feature request: support for https://github.com/google/guetzli
Commonly, users nowdays post 10 Mpix+images, you you have that 10*300 MB spare memory and 10 unised CPU minutes per image?Note: Guetzli uses a large amount of memory. You should provide 300MB of memory per 1MPix of the input image.
Note: Guetzli uses a significant amount of CPU time. You should count on using about 1 minute of CPU per 1 MPix of input image.
Question - Doers this really work it's way through the available providers??
I ask because if i have both Jpegoptim and reSmush.it enabled, it only EVER checks with Jpegoptim.... it doesnt LOOK to go anywhere near reSmush.it......
would still like webp support somehow, though. but, i think that's a cdn serving thing...
gotta wait for mass adoption of latest ios and macos builds by apple device users when they are released though.
picture
tag i believe. though i did read an article that used webp and jpg both in a single img tag with srcset. but i cannot find that right now. If I'm not wrong I'm using 80. But I can double check for you.For those running photography related sites, what value are you using for the Jpegoptim image quality? Any feedback from your members regarding the images from the value set?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.