It doesn't matter how you do it.
If you hover over the 2 options, you will note that the parent node ID is the same in each case (bottom left of your browser).
(Root)
-- A1
---- B1
---- B2
------ C1
------ C2
---- B3
I wouldn't quite say it is worthless...consider having a node with 50 children, you may have a node called nodeX and want to have a node appear directly after it...you could just click on create sibling on nodeX in the node tree and it would be in the right place....or say on the same board you know you need to add another node within a parent node you could quickly find that parent node to be and click create child. It isn't useless when it ends up saving you time on a board with a lot of nodes but I suppose it can appear that way when you don't really need it.So it's just another way of make the same thing? It seems worthless, but what i know, anyway. Thanks for answer.
I wouldn't quite say it is worthless...consider having a node with 50 children, you may have a node called nodeX and want to have a node appear directly after it...you could just click on create sibling on nodeX in the node tree and it would be in the right place....or say on the same board you know you need to add another node within a parent node you could quickly find that parent node to be and click create child. It isn't useless when it ends up saving you time on a board with a lot of nodes but I suppose it can appear that way when you don't really need it.
The letters correspond to generations sort of in a way, A is a parent of all B , B is parent to all C, C is parent to all D and so on....-- A1
---- B1
---- B2
------ C1
------ C2
---- B3
(Root)
-- A1
---- B1
---- B2
------ C1
------ D1
------ E1
------ F1
And so on...
---- B3
Incorrect.Siblings and child are both "SUB FORUMS" basically.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.