Again...you show you are not concerned with what I want as a customer OF XF, all you are concerned about is your friendship with your 3rd party dev friends. You wont juxtaposition yourself as a person who values your privacy nor will you super impose others view of privacy as weighting to your responses. If it is not with you...you bash people or disregard them because of their view of privacy....when I made my point in the other thread you had it closed...and started a new one.What post? I told you, I don't agree with your ideas. What else do you want?
Again...you show you are not concerned with what I want as a customer OF XF, all you are concerned about is your friendship with your 3rd party dev friends. You wont juxtaposition yourself as a person who values your privacy nor will you super impose others view of privacy as weighting to your responses. If it is not with you...you bash people or disregard them because of their view of privacy....when I made my point in the other thread you had it closed...and started a new one.
I stated clear things you will not address...and I am not the only one...
One:First and foremost, please link me to where I bashed anyone? I haven't bashed, or I am certain my post would have been removed or I would have been warned....
Secondly, no, I personally do not see this as a privacy issue. That is again, my opinion. Some agree, some disagree. So yes, in that aspect, I will disregard others opinion that it is, because I do not see it as an issue. Sue me.
How about a compromise? I personally like the idea of knowing for certain that someone is licenced, associates could have an associate tag, but not linked to specific licenced users - except to staff. When someone becomes "unassociated", a simple PC could be dropped to a staff member to confirm that they are no longer associated with any licences, if confirmation is needed for a developer.
Basically the only acceptable data for me is this...
I would be more than happy with that and I don't understand why its not show already. but that's not what is being asked for here. he is suggesting for more information to be shared.A simple way to show that a customer is licensed is being used over at XenForo's direct competitor, Invision Power Services.
View attachment 43193
I have yet to see one complaint about it. At here, it seems like a big fuss about such a simple feature.
At the end, it is not up for us but the developers on if they want to implement this.
I'm not against him making the proposal, I've got a problem with the fact that he's already made the proposal, and when people disagreed got the thread closed, and now is back with the same thing a few weeks later.I don't see why you're so against someone making a proposal. It is completely XenForo's decision if they implement the changes or not, and these changes addressed all of the arguments people made in the past, even most of yours. It's more like you have some sort of personal vendetta against Stewart now for no reason, which is just completely childish.
I'm not against him making the proposal, I've got a problem with the fact that he's already made the proposal, and when people disagreed got the thread closed, and now is back with the same thing a few weeks later.
What you want invades what I want and for that matter have right now...you wont listen to anything related to the 'WHY' of anything opposing your view, even though those views come no where near invading what you want or currently have.But yet, when I suggest what is only acceptable for me, I am in the wrong? Amazing how that works.
What you want invades what I want and for that matter have right now...you wont listen to anything related to the 'WHY' of anything opposing your view, even though those views come no where near invading what you want or currently have.
Nothing amazing really....just common sense.
How about a compromise? I personally like the idea of knowing for certain that someone is licenced, associates could have an associate tag, but not linked to specific licenced users - except to staff. When someone becomes "unassociated", a simple PC could be dropped to a staff member to confirm that they are no longer associated with any licences, if confirmation is needed for a developer.
It would be; as soon as the forum user name was removed from a license.Would have to be automatic somehow.
It would be; as soon as the forum user name was removed from a license.
Yeah, i don't think I was clear. I didn't mean dropping a note to staff by the person dropped/or the licence owner who's dropped them.. but for the developers who want to check whether someone is still associated or something has glitched and the tag been removed accidently. So, say you were going through your thread on here and you spot someone who was approved on xfs as being licenced but is now showing as not, you'd drop a message to one of the staff here just to confirm.... if that makes sense.That would almost have to be the case. If required for someone to just send a message, which is still a good suggestion, with certain individuals it would never happen. They could amass a small army of names that are supposedly associated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.