J Jumuro Well-known member Oct 12, 2017 #1 Jumuro submitted a new resource: [JUM] No Gif Avatar - disallow animated avatars. Disallow the use of GIF avatars for certain user groups. View attachment 159668 Click to expand... Read more about this resource...
Jumuro submitted a new resource: [JUM] No Gif Avatar - disallow animated avatars. Disallow the use of GIF avatars for certain user groups. View attachment 159668 Click to expand... Read more about this resource...
L LurkerLou Active member Oct 12, 2017 #2 Animated avatars are allowed in 2.x? I know they can be uploaded in 1.X, but only displayed when you click on someone's avatar. Is it the same in 2.X?
Animated avatars are allowed in 2.x? I know they can be uploaded in 1.X, but only displayed when you click on someone's avatar. Is it the same in 2.X?
J Jumuro Well-known member Oct 12, 2017 #3 LurkerLou said: Animated avatars are allowed in 2.x? Click to expand... Yes, they work in any part of content XenForo 2.
LurkerLou said: Animated avatars are allowed in 2.x? Click to expand... Yes, they work in any part of content XenForo 2.
L LurkerLou Active member Oct 12, 2017 #4 Jumuro said: Yes, they work in any part of content XenForo 2. Click to expand... I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for the information.
Jumuro said: Yes, they work in any part of content XenForo 2. Click to expand... I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for the information.
J Jumuro Well-known member Oct 12, 2017 #5 LurkerLou said: I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for the information. Click to expand... Note that this image processing must be done by the Imagemagick PHP extension.
LurkerLou said: I wasn't aware of that. Thank you for the information. Click to expand... Note that this image processing must be done by the Imagemagick PHP extension.
D deslocotoco Well-known member Jun 17, 2019 #8 Is working on 2.1? I did enabled the Imagik (deals better with quotes and stuff) but the animated avatars are a crazy thing right now.
Is working on 2.1? I did enabled the Imagik (deals better with quotes and stuff) but the animated avatars are a crazy thing right now.
K kick Well-known member Jul 19, 2019 #9 The following should be adhered to with respect to schema changes: New tables must be prefixed with xf_ and additionally an identifier for the add-on e.g. xf_mg_. New columns to core tables must be prefixed with an identifier for the add-on e.g. xfmg_. Click to expand... If a class extension is required to extend core methods then it must be extended properly, rather than overridden, by calling the parent method. Click to expand... Last edited by a moderator: Jul 19, 2019
The following should be adhered to with respect to schema changes: New tables must be prefixed with xf_ and additionally an identifier for the add-on e.g. xf_mg_. New columns to core tables must be prefixed with an identifier for the add-on e.g. xfmg_. Click to expand... If a class extension is required to extend core methods then it must be extended properly, rather than overridden, by calling the parent method. Click to expand...
Chris D XenForo developer Staff member Jul 19, 2019 #10 kick said: The following should be adhered to with respect to schema changes: New tables must be prefixed with xf_ and additionally an identifier for the add-on e.g. xf_mg_. New columns to core tables must be prefixed with an identifier for the add-on e.g. xfmg_. Click to expand... Click to expand... This add-on doesn't have any schema changes. If a class extension is required to extend core methods then it must be extended properly, rather than overridden, by calling the parent method. Click to expand... We would recommend a different approach to this though, please, @Jumuro. The problematic code is in the validateImageAsAvatar method. If you need advice, please post in the Development Discussions forum.
kick said: The following should be adhered to with respect to schema changes: New tables must be prefixed with xf_ and additionally an identifier for the add-on e.g. xf_mg_. New columns to core tables must be prefixed with an identifier for the add-on e.g. xfmg_. Click to expand... Click to expand... This add-on doesn't have any schema changes. If a class extension is required to extend core methods then it must be extended properly, rather than overridden, by calling the parent method. Click to expand... We would recommend a different approach to this though, please, @Jumuro. The problematic code is in the validateImageAsAvatar method. If you need advice, please post in the Development Discussions forum.
Chris D XenForo developer Staff member Aug 9, 2019 #11 @Jumuro please provide an ETA as to when the reported issue will be resolved.
J Jumuro Well-known member Aug 9, 2019 #12 Chris D said: @Jumuro please provide an ETA as to when the reported issue will be resolved. Click to expand... This problem is planned to be solved within a month or less (depending on the free time from the main work).
Chris D said: @Jumuro please provide an ETA as to when the reported issue will be resolved. Click to expand... This problem is planned to be solved within a month or less (depending on the free time from the main work).
J Jumuro Well-known member Sep 3, 2019 #14 Jumuro updated [JUM] No Gif Avatar with a new update entry: 2.0.2 refactoring according to standards. Click to expand... Read the rest of this update entry...
Jumuro updated [JUM] No Gif Avatar with a new update entry: 2.0.2 refactoring according to standards. Click to expand... Read the rest of this update entry...
J Jumuro Well-known member Oct 12, 2020 #15 Jumuro updated [JUM] No Gif Avatar with a new update entry: 2.2.0 Cosmetic code changes Fix plugin icon Click to expand... Read the rest of this update entry...
Jumuro updated [JUM] No Gif Avatar with a new update entry: 2.2.0 Cosmetic code changes Fix plugin icon Click to expand... Read the rest of this update entry...