Mr. Goodie2Shoes
Well-known member
Yes, in that case the process will be marked as error'd. And once the support is added you can just re-enqueue themIs it possible to use jpegoptim and not use kraken? Meaning that png will not be optimized?
Yes, in that case the process will be marked as error'd. And once the support is added you can just re-enqueue themIs it possible to use jpegoptim and not use kraken? Meaning that png will not be optimized?
In older versions, the option ids for key, secret and lossy compression were key, secret, lossy respectively I have changed it to krakenKey, krakenSecret and krakenLossy for the new system. And I don't remember XenForo having option ID mapping so you have to reenter themWhat does this mean?
The Option IDs have changed so re-configure the add-on upon upgrade.
Adding it to my to-do listFor the logging, is it possible to also record the process used for compression (jpegoptim / kraken / future stuff)
I've tried 75%, 70% and 65% and the visible difference is negligible. There you can just about see the slight matting effect on the image where pixels are being merged on 65% compared to 70%, but it's nothing obvious unless at 100%.For lossy compression the quality is set to 65 which produces more or less same images as kraken... thoughts?
Crossing my fingers... lolNow to try on this:
You mean on a per record basis, globally at the bottom or both
hehe... okayBoth .
I don't have a high density display,how picture will display on retina's display after the optimization? some one test it? they will be worst?
I've got a 4k resolution screen on my laptop, and the difference is more than acceptable, and you can only really tell when looking at the image on 100% zoom
Nohmmm... have you killed any pending deferred task?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.