The trial date has been canceled and there is not another one set now. February is just a talking session, basically. We don't know when the new trial date will be and I for one will start looking elsewhere for forum software. I was fine with giving xenForo until the trial was over, granted that the trail was to start in January like planned. But I will not waste more time into next year, with no updates and no communication from Mike or Kier.
It's a shame because I really don't blame you guys for everything and know that Internet Brands will probably win this with their big bank lawyers. The pressure was never on them to do anything and they put it all on you.
However, this was the last straw for me when it comes to holding out hope. It's been 2 years and 2 months since the lawsuit has been filed and your lawyers have still not managed to get this to trial. No matter who the fault, the lack of any progress over the last 9 months and this update are just too much. Maybe you can pull it through. Maybe you can't. I'll still be around to see what happens but this was a big blow, when it came to whether or not I was going to renew my licenses. I can buy 5-6 new IP.Board licenses for what it would cost me to renew the ones I have expired by the time you guys get to a trial.
No need to leave, im sure things will get better here. The trial was supposed to happen in about a month, not a big deal it's been pushed back further.
What more do you want the staff to say or do? It's already been confirmed by multiple forum members that Mike, Kier, and Ashley are all still working at XenForo and on XenForo, and the recent downtime was to secretly update the site to Xenforo 1.2. Any further updates are just redundant, we know the product is stagnant because of the court case, we just have to wait it out some more.
xenForo is starting to have a lot of annoying issues and bugs that aren't being fixed on my end.
Bugs where ? IPB has way more bugs....is starting to have a lot of annoying issues and bugs that aren't being fixed on my end..
I saw a bug in my bathroomWhat bugs? I can probably provide code fixes.
After read this I consider myself an idiot.xenForo is starting to have a lot of annoying issues and bugs that aren't being fixed on my end.
Docket Text #156 said:EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for granting leave to file supplemental opposition filed by defendant Michael Sullivan. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order Prop Order, # (2) Memorandum Prop Supp Opposition, # (3) Proposed Order Prop Declaration)(Deitchle, Pamela)
I'm not leaving but I am exploring other solutions. xenForo is starting to have a lot of annoying issues and bugs that aren't being fixed on my end.
Plaintiff’s contrary assertion is a new tale spun to trick the Court and to
obtain an unfair “second bite” without showing the required good cause. In more
than two years of litigating this case here and in England, Plaintiff has taken three
full days of percipient witness depositions, propounded more than 220 documents
requests, and received tens of thousands of pages of documents from Sullivan,
Darby, and XenForo. Plaintiff’s counsel is engaging in yet another twisted attempt
to cause further delays and impede Defendants’ efforts to clear their names.
What bugs? I can probably provide code fixes.
The legal process is a slow painful one.
It would appear so!The legal process is a slow painful one.
Docket Text #157 said:Opposition in Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for granting leave to file supplemental opposition[156] Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant Michael Sullivan's Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Supplemental Brief Opposing Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Answer to Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff vBulletin Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Declaration of Patrick Fraioli, # (2) Exhibit Exhibits A-C to Declaration of Patrick Fraioli)(Fraioli, Patrick)
Coming from the mouths of those that have pushed this case off again and again and...need I say more? It appears Judge R is seeing through IB's lawyers, thankfully, so with any luck the case can get to trial sooner rather than later.The Court should reject that strategy and should deny Sullivan's ex parte Application because it is an attempt at distraction. Even if it is true and correct — which it is not — the Application and argument is a sideshow.
It appears Judge R is seeing through IB's lawyers, thankfully, so with any luck the case can get to trial sooner rather than later.
People have been saying this exact same thing for over two years now about Judge R seeing through IB's lawyers and this going to trial.
I think it's safe to assume, he doesn't. And it's probably time to stop pretending anyone knows what the judge is thinking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.