Sheldon
Well-known member
Glad to see this thread open.
I'll check back in January.
I guess you missed the comments about November 5th.
California Case Update
- Thread starter Shamil
- Start date
- Status
I guess you missed the comments about November 5th.
Daniel Thomann
Active member
I did... thanks for that
Digital Doctor
Well-known member
I did.
What's the scoop ?
Sheldon
Well-known member
That's the problem with this thread. Maybe there should be a sticky for updates, then another thread for discussion?
There's a hearing on November 5th: http://xenforo.com/community/threads/california-case-update.10037/page-210#post-421953
There's a hearing on November 5th: http://xenforo.com/community/threads/california-case-update.10037/page-210#post-421953
Digital Doctor
Well-known member
Maybe IB wants it to get dismissed.
So they can appeal.
Remember, the goal isn't winning ... it's to drag things on and on.
I think I would want IB's ability to appeal severely hampered before I would want to get anything dismissed.
Chimpie
Well-known member
More than likely there will be three or four people with the same update. lol
Digital Doctor
Well-known member
Digital Doctor
Well-known member
Morgain
Well-known member
Dig naughty - this was well analysed already. A dismissal will not leave scope for appeal. (Jadmperry)
Pope Viper
Well-known member
Thoughts and prayers are with the team, both business and personally.
Joeychgo
Well-known member
They could appeal the dismissal order.....
jadmperry
Well-known member
Which will be reviewed for an "abuse of discretion" which almost always loses.
Adam Howard
Well-known member
Congratulations XenForo.
By invoking rule 41 with all things presented... There can only be 1 of 2 possibility
1) All current pending unfilled motions are dismissed with order of trail .... ie... They've forced the hand and there can be no further delay. Trial will continue, but with whatever IB has completed (which isn't much). In fact with what little they have it's likely going to be a short case (if not dismissed on that day).
2) It's dismissed out right in November.
By invoking rule 41 with all things presented... There can only be 1 of 2 possibility
1) All current pending unfilled motions are dismissed with order of trail .... ie... They've forced the hand and there can be no further delay. Trial will continue, but with whatever IB has completed (which isn't much). In fact with what little they have it's likely going to be a short case (if not dismissed on that day).
2) It's dismissed out right in November.
ManagerJosh
Well-known member
Motion File Date: October 1, 2012
File Pre-Trial Conference: October 24, 2012
Scheduled Motion Hearing: November 3, 2012
Discovery Cut Off: November 13, 2012
Anyone get the feeling IB is about to slam XF with a tsunami of complaints so close to the discovery cut off date only to validate Rule 41?
File Pre-Trial Conference: October 24, 2012
Scheduled Motion Hearing: November 3, 2012
Discovery Cut Off: November 13, 2012
Anyone get the feeling IB is about to slam XF with a tsunami of complaints so close to the discovery cut off date only to validate Rule 41?
robdog
Well-known member
Anyone get the feeling IB is about to slam XF with a tsunami of complaints so close to the discovery cut off date only to validate Rule 41?
It is possible, but the judge is seriously over their BS right now. If they came back with over-the-top ridiculous claims, he would not be to happy with them.
However, KAM's lawyer is a seriously good writer and drops very subtle jabs at the IB legal team. Love reading their filings, lol... But I want this over...
- Status