Adam Howard
Well-known member
??Payment of $31 made to PACER

??Payment of $31 made to PACER
Payment of $31 made to PACER
The vB suit is to prevent competition by forcing them to use their resources for lawyers vs. things like marketing. And if it's Door No. 1, XenForo will be taking over ForumCon.com.
They might be following their passion and feeling lucky they make a living at it. Which makes producing great software an end to a means. They can't stop doing, don't want to stop doing, would do it no matter what. The life of Jobs.
That doesn't preclude getting big payoff from vB and agreeing to make even more money making great software continuing to develop XenForo under whatever name.
Internet Brands main business is running forums, buying vB was a case of vertical integration for them. They screwed up in not going with Plan A (vB4.0 aka Xenforo). OK...they fix the mistake. Wouldn't Internet Brands save a LOT of money on its forum business side but using XenForo? It would save even more money not having to develop vB5 and using XenForo as the upgrade path.
It would definitely save them a lot of money, but there are other issues at play here, including ones that deal with pride, humility, ego, and image
LOL...if you want to match PACER payments, I am game (but, you will lose).
A lot will depend on IB internals. If they are losing sales to IPBoards and XenForo, they will have huge incentive to bring XenForo in house. If they are really announcing their own inhouse created vB5 on Tuesday then its death cab for cutie as far as vB vs. XF, two codes enter, one code leaves kind of resolution.
A lot depends on XenForo internals, do they have the cash to fight the lawsuit.
What VB does on Tuesday will be the sound of one shoe dropping.
We could start a betting club on this... though Xenforo odds wouldn't be worth betting on IMHO for a win, just like VB for lose... the odds would be like betting on betting on Black Caviar!
Ummm....
![]()
Maybe we should just see how this all unfolds....
![]()
Yesterday, Posner scrapped a trial between Apple and Google's Motorola Mobility slated to start in Chicago next week after he rejected the arguments for damages because neither side was able to prove it was harmed.
The move is a welcome breath of practicality in this increasingly muddled and litigious world of technology patent warfare. Beyond competing in the market, technology players have moved to the courtroom as a second front, using patents to distract competitors and even ban products from coming into the country.
Check back Dec 21, 2012. Or rather, Dec 22, 2012.Was there suspicion that we wouldn't be here?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.