California Case Update

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kim said:
I recall my Law professor on day one, lecture one, telling us that if you don't have a VERY sound grasp of English and a very nimble use of the language you will not make it through the course, nor in the Law at all.
Click to expand...

It would certainly help while you interpret/read the laws in order to make your case, but I would like to think that simple would be better when you actually do make your plea.
 
I should point out, at risk of going off topic again, that this whole side thread of conversation started because shamil said "this action". So......I'm going now.:sleep:
 
Digital Jedi said:
I should point out, at risk of going off topic again, that this whole side thread of conversation started because shamil said "this action". So......I'm going now.:sleep:
Click to expand...
Yes, I remember when this topic used to be about the lawsuit, rather than how to choose your words.

Ah well, at least I'm up to date again.
 
Hopefully tomorrow will be something we can all smile (or even better laugh at) afterwards. It sounds like team legal xF have their heads screwed on, and more worryingly for IB, we've yet to see them pull a single piece of evidence out the bag that they could use to justify their case.
 
Wasn't the hearing moved from Oct 3rd to the 17th? Or am I missing something?

Shamil said:
http://www.shamil.la/vbulletin-solutions-vs-xenforo-limited-etc/#74

COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED that on the Court's own motion the:
Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of order dismissing 7th & 8th claims of 1st amended complaint, and for leave to file 2nd amended complaint
is hereby ORDERED CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 3, 2011 AT 10:00 A.M.
TO OCTOBER 17, 2011 AT 10:00 A.M. Opposition and Reply papers remain due as originally set, pursuant to the rules, by the hearing date of October 3, 2011. The continuation of the hearing DOES NOT move the due dates of
those filings.
Click to expand...
 
Floris said:
After an informal assessment by the board members, the concession is in your favour as to how you verbally express yourself. As we're content with verity that it is not of consequence to the readers of this public discussion on this particular platform.
Click to expand...
Marc said:
huh? lol
Click to expand...
Slavik said:
what u dun say there bud?
Click to expand...

Translation: The fellas and I talked it over and we decided we liked your jive, no matter what anyone else says.
 
TheLaw said:
Book better titled as "How to Convince the Judge's Clerk and Win Your Case." I have always been a fan of straight, simple talk, only using a specific word when there is a purpose or where another isn't adequately or just doesn't suffice. For a sophisticated crowd, sometimes choosing one more "accurate" synonym over another can make a subtle but important difference. But that doesn't excuse using a more complicated word that few are likely to know (which makes one sound pretentious.) You're better erring on the side of comprehension rather than hoping to score bonus points by adding unnecessary complexity.
Click to expand...
TheLaw said:
IMHO, good for Shamil. So he derives some pleasure in covering this case and providing updates to other people who are grateful. Sometimes you don't need a reason other than that you enjoy being the one who is reporting the events. After all, millions of bloggers "waste" their time on far more trivial and useless matters while this one has a good purpose. Rock on, Shamil.
Click to expand...

vBcom quote: (licensed customers only)
Shamil.;2214487 said:
I am using the "vBulletin Solutions Inc vs XenForo Limited, Kier Darby and DOES 1-10" case as my year term.
Click to expand...
But I agree, it's great that Shamil has taken a personal interest and is providing regular updates :)
 
Peggy said:
I didn't relize that Scott M had joined the vb.com "team".
Click to expand...
I don't think he is.

Taken from Scott's sig on vb.com

The official German distributor of vBulletin
I am NOT an employee of Internet Brands. I am their partner. The opinons I may share on this forum DO NOT necessarily convey the opinions of Internet Brands or its employees.
Click to expand...
 
Peggy said:
Ah I was going by his user title. I thought it said vB.com team. I see now that it says vBG.com team.
My bad... (n)
Click to expand...
Peggy, you're not the first person to mention it so don't feel bad. I think it is because he is using a vB staff avatar and so a lot of people have assumed that he is an vB/IB employee in some of the threads.
 
Kevin said:
Peggy, you're not the first person to mention it so don't feel bad. I think it is because he is using a vB staff avatar and so a lot of people have assumed that he is an vB/IB employee in some of the threads.
Click to expand...
Thanks hunny. Yeah that was the other thing.
 
Yes, that's right...I meant that something good comes from the filings. We won't know the outcome until the judge rules, but as we have seen from previous filings, a lot of good "nuggets" of information can come out from the briefs.
 
Oh, I haven't looked at the local rules, but many courts allow for filings through the E-case filing system until midnight on the due date. So, we may not see new documents posted for several hours yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom