What I am using is right for me. It find it fits well within my budget, offers the services I need, has fair support, and overall is fast loading.Thank you so much! Very helpful. In your own opinion, which of the above list is the best or the one that you are using?
Hi Motobaka,
Are you sure that XFHost is really good? Have you read this feedbacks?
http://xenforo.com/community/threads/xf-host.64747/
Of course, that does not include problems which you cause yourself......software based, etc.
"If you aim the gun at your foot and pull the trigger, it's UNIX's job to ensure reliable delivery of the bullet to where you aimed the gun (in this case, Mr. Foot)."
2 security breaches in the last 18 months gives me pause for concern.I'd personally recommend Linode.
2 security breaches in the last 18 months gives me pause for concern.
Adam, I think its important to mention that you also use CDN and at additional cost for it on top of your current hosting plan. So in all fairness it is impossible to rate your sites performance on the host package itself.What I am using is right for me. It find it fits well within my budget, offers the services I need, has fair support, and overall is fast loading.
Heavy / Corporate Plan
affiliate link: https://www.canspace.ca/clients/aff.php?aff=005
However, what is right for me, may not be what you need. You need to ask yourself how much do you want to spend, what services & resources do you need, and finally what level of support.
The test site, does not use CDN.Adam, I think its important to mention that you also use CDN and at additional cost for it on top of your current hosting plan. So in all fairness it is impossible to rate your sites performance on the host package itself.
I'd disagree with that - when you look at your site through a raw browsers eyes, most of the page load content is likely to be images, css, and javascript. It's either local browser cache, or content from CDN. Yes, the dynamic content is your site/server directly, but for total page size this dynamic content is not the majority.so the majority will not have anything to do with a CDN
You can have the best CDN in the world, but if your host does not process the php and mysql .... It's not going to matter.I'd disagree with that - when you look at your site through a raw browsers eyes, most of the page load content is likely to be images, css, and javascript. It's either local browser cache, or content from CDN. Yes, the dynamic content is your site/server directly, but for total page size this dynamic content is not the majority.
Correct. But that's hardly the majority having nothing to do with CDN.You can have the best CDN in the world, but if your host does not process the php and mysql .... It's not going to matter.
XenForo stock, without add-ons or any customizations has more php files than it does js or image files. All of which also bring up and help call the css, js, and image files (as well as msql queries).Correct. But that's hardly the majority having nothing to do with CDN.
Irrelevant to your assertion that the majority of an XF site content comes from the server and not from CDN (when used/active), which is plain wrong.So before you even reach that CDN, you're depending on the host.
We'll agree to disagree.Irrelevant to your assertion that the majority of an XF site content comes from the server and not from CDN (when used/active), which is plain wrong.
We'll agree to disagree.
Because I find it very relevant.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.