Inevitably, much of the conversation outside of the lawsuit still turns back to a basic vB vs. XF comparison.
What kills me is the fact that vB promised a great product through a "pre-sale" and the fabled "Fabian's List" of features that vB has now completely repudiated as being in any version of their promised product. It has been three years since that money grab, and (oddly to me) many folks have forgiven this just because of the passage of time and the announcement of vB5. Part of my confusion comes from the fact that vB gets a pass from many folks because they promise great things in the future (while being completely opaque and non-committal about pricing, features, and future support of 4.x series....and they basically say that anything stated before about the product should be ignored).
Another point about the comparison between products that kills me is that people here seem to be upset about the "developers" or the "company" making statements, and pointing to the communication from vB. This baffles me completely, as the lead developers "over there" (ostensibly Kevin Sours or some other unknown person...Edwin Brown for CMS?) rarely post, but a ton of other folks do, with sometimes conflicting info (Paul M, CvP, Wayne Luke, Lawrence Cole, et. al,), but none of these folks are the "company" (when was the last time Bob Briscoe or Joe Rosenblum posted anything of substance or that can be relied on...I think it has been years, if I am not wrong). People get wound up here about the lack of posting by KAM...but the analogous situation from vB is the same or worse....again, I might be wrong, but the last post I can find from Joe Rosenblum on vB.com is from Nov. 2011. It just confuses the heck out of me that if you match up the staffing structure and posting, posts by Jake, Slavik, and Lawrence, don't seem to settle people the same way that posts from Wayne Luke, Paul M, CvP, BirdofPrey5 (sorry if I forgot their names or got them wrong), do. vB fans seem to accept posts from staff their as gospel and proof that all is right in the world, while deprecating posts from staff here with equal or greater authority of knowledge (I can't count the number of vB posts from these folks mentioned that conflict, say contradictory things, or put things of as, "we will know when we know."). I am just stumped by the fact that a much faster response rate here with more or equal authority seems to be denigrated by some...when for example, the lead developer for vB, Kevin Sours, by my search on their site shows a post from July 2012, and the next previous post being from Oct 2011). I think people get confused by there being a lot of staff at vB and less here at XF. But as far as substantive posts that you can count on? I think (my opinion, you can refute it with facts if you like...but as I have said before, my opinion is mine), XF beats the crap out of the competition (lawsuit, doom and gloom drama included) in terms of responsiveness and actual contact from developers. And more importantly, I believe the statement made here more than the statement made there by an exponential factor.
"Nuff said."