The current version doesn't have this sort of bug, but it will not retroactively fix it if an IP has been associated with a post before.Please confirm urgently once this serious bug has been fixed. Thank you.
The current version doesn't have this sort of bug, but it will not retroactively fix it if an IP has been associated with a post before.Please confirm urgently once this serious bug has been fixed. Thank you.
- Prevent ignorable errors breaking report indexing (with Report Improvements)
The PM portion is below all that but you probably need to include that user and user ID because it needs to have "something" originate that PM.Thank you for your response. But, I do not want to create a thread and a report like your settings. I just wish to receive a PM.
Any other ideas?
The PM portion is below all that but you probably need to include that user and user ID because it needs to have "something" originate that PM.
How have you setup "only one who can use an alter ego"? The "bypass alter ego" means the account will not be checked, even if it is detected as an alterego.Are we sure this is working?
I purposely logged in as another member and I di not receive a PM. Is it cron based?
I have my settings set up so I am the only one to view reports and the only one who can use an alter ego.
Thanks.
It already has the option to create a new thread rather than replying to an existing one. Do you mean you want it all to go to an existing thread?@Xon loving this on my small forum.
Is there a way we could have the option to post a new thread instead be post a reply in a thread? If that is something I could rewrite in the code myself because it might not be that useful for everyone else that is fine.
Correct, one thread for all of it, either it creates it and stays in that thread or I could point it to one, whichever is easier.It already has the option to create a new thread rather than replying to an existing one. Do you mean you want it all to go to an existing thread?
I've recorded this as a feature request, but I'm quite busy working through my add-on backlog so I can't offer any ETA.Correct, one thread for all of it, either it creates it and stays in that thread or I could point it to one, whichever is easier.
No problem, figured I would reach out and see if it was a quick fix or pie in the sky. Thanks for responding and putting it on your plate.I've recorded this as a feature request, but I'm quite busy working through my add-on backlog so I can't offer any ETA.
How have you setup "only one who can use an alter ego"? The "bypass alter ego" means the account will not be checked, even if it is detected as an alterego.
Use "Not Set (no)", otherwise a user will never be reported.Which permission (for the Bypass Alter ego permission) should be filled in so a user(s) CANNOT have an alter ego?
Not Set (no)
Allow
Never
Sorry for a lack of follow up, but can you PM me the stack trace so I can see where it is failing?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.