Add Cloud Storage?

Mutterz

Mutterz

New member
I am thinking of switching from Phpbb to xenforo but would like to know if it is possible to add BackBlaze B2 as storage for attachments? I am currently using the demo but don't see any settings for this. I looked at some addons, but they are paid, and I'm not sure if they would work or are what I'm looking for. Any advice would be helpful.
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
It's possible but it's not enabled out of the box, so it would require some custom work similar to what is required for S3.

xenforo.com

Using DigitalOcean Spaces or Amazon S3 for file storage in XF 2.1 & XF 2.2

XenForo Version Compatibility The download is only compatible with XenForo 2.1 and XenForo 2.2. XenForo 2.3 is supported by following the guide but the download attached to this resource is no longer required. Why this guide? Since XenForo...
xenforo.com xenforo.com
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I have used B2 with XenForo using the Amazon S3 connector as mentioned above. Backblaze added s3 compatible api endpoints a while ago. It works fine. You might need to use CloudFlare to get a nicer URL iirc. But it works fine with XenForo.

S3-Compatible API

Use the Backblaze S3-Compatible API to interact with Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage.
www.backblaze.com www.backblaze.com
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Or just use Linode with their block storage. Much simpler, faster too, than using a third party to pull attachments.

xenforo.com

Use a Linode Block Storage Volume for your XenForo attachments

Linode’s Block Storage service allows you to attach additional storage Volumes to your Linode. A single Volume can range from 10 GiB to 10,000 GiB in size and costs $0.10/GiB per month. If you run your XenForo forum on a Linode server and have a...
xenforo.com xenforo.com
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
block storage is available at other hosts as well. digitalocean has it for instance. there are performance and reliability benefits. but it is not really worth it to migrate to one of these platforms if you are already happy with your existing host. self managed hosting solutions can be a pain if you are running a popular website.

one another benefit of using s3/b2 type service is that migration from one platform to another is pretty straightforward. moving your forum files and database is a pretty simple experience if all your heavy data is already offloaded to a third party service that you can continue to use after moving to a new host.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
adriannx said:
For large storage, Linode is expensive.
For example, I would like to use the Resouse addon to store large files larger than 1GB. In this case a dedicated server would be better.
Click to expand...
My site uses 110Gb storage, and like I said I saved $40/mth moving from dedicated to Linode + Block. Not sure what comparison you're using to determine otherwise. For storing and delivering 1+ Gb resource files, you're better off using - dedicated or cloud/vps - object storage.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes for large forums.
One site I manage has 1.4TB of attachments.

That's $140 on Linode for just the storage + main server + bandwidth cost, etc..
Instead we just use Hetzner Dedicated server that cost only $102 USD with 2 x 3.84 TB of storage.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
rdn said:
Yes for large forums.
One site I manage has 1.4TB of attachments.

That's $140 on Linode for just the storage + main server + bandwidth cost, etc..
Instead we just use Hetzner Dedicated server that cost only $102 USD with 2 x 3.84 TB of storage.
Click to expand...
Dedicated server is much batter for large forums.
As per your host specs.
Is is nvme ssd storage?
Very unlikely.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
dknife said:
SSD block storage is around $10 per 100Gb. Is that expensive to you?
Click to expand...
Dedicated server at Hetzner provides
  • 2 x 8 TB HDD
  • AMD Ryzen™ 7 3700X .
  • Ram 64GB DDR4 ECC .
  • 1 Gbit/s-Port .
  • Traffic usage, Unlimited
Price: $60 USD Monthly

For more info click here

That's why I say it's expensive.

If possible I would like to use the MinIO software, with this you can create your own server similar to Amazon S3 Object. But unfortunately I still don't have the knowledge to do it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Chromaniac said:
but it is not really worth it to migrate to one of these platforms if you are already happy with your existing host. self managed hosting solutions can be a pain if you are running a popular website.
Click to expand...
I call nonsense to this. You will pay a fraction of the cost than managed hosting, and once its up and running, you don't have to touch it. I haven't touched my server in years since doing a major upgrade to it. Even that, was all straight forward, I only had the site offline for about 15 minutes while the server itself updated, all the hosting software can be updated on the fly and restarted. The only downtime is if you screwup something, but that shouldn't happen if you do a practice server first.

Its faster than any host I've ever used around the world, bang for buck.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Anthony Parsons said:
I call nonsense to this. You will pay a fraction of the cost than managed hosting, and once its up and running, you don't have to touch it. I haven't touched my server in years since doing a major upgrade to it. Even that, was all straight forward, I only had the site offline for about 15 minutes while the server itself updated, all the hosting software can be updated on the fly and restarted. The only downtime is if you screwup something, but that shouldn't happen if you do a practice server first.

Its faster than any host I've ever used around the world, bang for buck.
Click to expand...
If you've got a dedicated server that you haven't "touched in years", please let us all know the site, as I don't want ANYTHING to do with it. Any admin that ignores updates to their OS and core structure for years is a hazard to their users.
Even using Ubuntu LTS as a server platform, it still has regular security updates that need to be installed.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Tracy Perry said:
If you've got a dedicated server that you haven't "touched in years", please let us all know the site, as I don't want ANYTHING to do with it. Any admin that ignores updates to their OS and core structure for years is a hazard to their users.
Even using Ubuntu LTS as a server platform, it still has regular security updates that need to be installed.
Click to expand...
I'm assuming he means hardware, as he specifically mentioned updates in the post.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote

Similar threads

K
Xenforo allows resetting existing install if it fails to connect to cloud storage provider
Replies
0
Views
52
K a M a L
K
Myck
  • Poll Poll
Add-on In your experience, which cloud storage service is best for Xenfor?
Replies
2
Views
232
Marcus
Marcus
frm
  • Question Question
XenForo with Vultr Object Storage
Replies
4
Views
153
frm
frm
Fullmental
Object Storage/S3 users, how is your I/O performance?
Replies
14
Views
2K
eva2000
eva2000
SRK
  • Question Question
Xenforo Cloud Queries
Replies
6
Views
2K
Paul B
P
Back
Top Bottom