Again: You are barking the wrong tree. The add on has not been updated for almost two years and was and is totally fine. It is provided for free, the work of the author is basically self exploitation.So from the dev's point of view could be a completely different approach, and I'm sure Andrew will know what (and IF) to do about.
You on the other hand are using a commercial so called "security solution" that costs 144$/year according to their webpage, describes itself as "A Smarter Approach to Server Security" and claims "We stop threats at every stage with multiple, integrated layers of protection." Instead, it does not seem smart at all but rather not trustworthy. As often, it seems to be so called "security theater" in the long tradition of snake oil by vendors of anti virus software which creates good profits for the seller, creates (intentionally) the wrong impression of protection for it's users - and nothing but trouble and extra work for people like Andrew. He did nothing wrong and clearly nothing dangerous. The "security solution" instead created issues. Yet you ask Andrew to do something about it instead of addressing the issue where it belongs and where it is caused: By the commercial company that sells the snake oil for good profits and possibly by your webhoster, if it is him and not yourself who installed this snake oil.
If even your friend Claude says this false positive would be a common issue with said "security product"...
...the company behind this product should be well aware of that as well - and yet the do not improve their product and yet you do not complain with them but are barking the wrong tree. Why? The solution is obviously to get rid of the snake oil as it does not work, is harmful and maybe dangerous, hinders perfectly fine software from working and stops you from installing the software that you want to use. Why should one want such a product?That pattern — inline HTML with an anchor tag inserted via bulk DB write — is a common false positive trigger for Imunify360's OSSEC/malware scanner rules.


