Why http:// and not http://www.?

Welcome to forums. If you open a thread/topic you will get discussion from everyone. If you do not like it, you may be in the wrong place.

Excuse me? One thing is opening a thread to discuss something in general and one thing is opening a thread to ask a question about a website. If you don't understand, you might need to think about it a little bit more.
 
Excuse me? One thing is opening a thread to discuss something in general and one thing is opening a thread to ask a question about a website. If you don't understand, you might need to think about it a little bit more.

He's got a point though. You can't really stop people from posting in a thread when it's publicly available. If you really want a private discussion with Kier and Mike, there's the Conversation feature for that.

Otherwise, they're pretty busy with a lot of other things, and you'll just have to wait to see if they'll respond.
 
I agree it brings balance... but if anyone needs to type it in manually they know they can go with juot.net and it will forward them to www...
 
www was used to determine what service one was requesting over the internet: world wide web, secure, ftp, nntp (news net). Todays servers look at the lack of a preceding www as a request for a www page by default, so it is not required. If you type mypage.com, you will end up at www.mypage.com anyways, even if you do not set up a map.

To use it or not, I think it is just personal preference.
 
Top Bottom