dvsDave
Well-known member
In light of the relatively recent ruling of Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-23020 (S.D. Fla.) found that Winn-Dixie was in violation of the ADA by not having their site conform to WCAG 2.0 AA Compliance Standards. This is the first time that a company has been found in violation for their website in a Federal Court.
Regardless of what type of organization you are, this decision has serious implications that affect your forum. Many organizations have argued that they are not held to any web accessibility compliance by laws like the ADA, and yet have been sued and hit with major legal costs. This ruling offers federal precedence that will inevitably help push legislation to incorporate WCAG 2.0 standards as the benchmark. It might be wise to begin planning out your accessibility governance strategy now, rather than face the possibility of a suit later.
XenForo 2.0 baseline isn't bad, there are some form issues and a TON of duplicate links and titles, but altogether, not too shabby. (at least on the forum list page, haven't delved into content pages yet)
Any thoughts on this? Is this a priority for you?
Regardless of what type of organization you are, this decision has serious implications that affect your forum. Many organizations have argued that they are not held to any web accessibility compliance by laws like the ADA, and yet have been sued and hit with major legal costs. This ruling offers federal precedence that will inevitably help push legislation to incorporate WCAG 2.0 standards as the benchmark. It might be wise to begin planning out your accessibility governance strategy now, rather than face the possibility of a suit later.
XenForo 2.0 baseline isn't bad, there are some form issues and a TON of duplicate links and titles, but altogether, not too shabby. (at least on the forum list page, haven't delved into content pages yet)
Any thoughts on this? Is this a priority for you?