and this is how I'm saying that I prefer it. What's new is in front of me because it's the more important of the 3 links.
The least used links should be to the left, out of my way, as I don't use them much.
oh sorry, I thought you said that
What's New? IS the most important
to screen readers and most users, I would think that
What's New? is the most important task (should be first on the list)
on a separate note, no one has addressed the fact that the UI changes when logged in
What's New? is to the left (first on list) to GUESTS but when logged in
What's New? is to the right (last on the list) ... Don't you think it should stay the same -
What's New? at the top of the list?
For
RTL readers, the list should read (html source):
Quick Links (As Guest)
Quick Links (As Member Logged In)
- What's New
- Watched Threads
- Mark all forums read
looking at the design, it should be displayed as
Mark all forums read | Watched Threads | What's New .1
Making
What's New? the first thing one reads
For
LTR readers, the list should still read (html source):
Quick Links (As Guest)
Quick Links (As Member Logged In)
- What's New
- Watched Threads
- Mark all forums read
but the design is reversed:
1. What's New | Watched Threads | Mark all forums read
Making
What's New? the first thing one reads.
Usability (some characteristics)
- Should be the same for all users. eg. disabled, rtl, ltr, etc
- Should consider the importance and frequency of the task.
Please note that I'm not trying to change how the links are set here - I know that I can change it via a template edit. I just like discussing anything related to UI's, usability, and the likes of it.
