AWS
Well-known member
Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.You get nothing but pain from a dictator. Remember the guy you voted in is a convicted felon
He was convicted of nothing.
Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.You get nothing but pain from a dictator. Remember the guy you voted in is a convicted felon
They only know what the mainstream media tells them what they should know.Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.
This is an astounding disregard for the facts.He was convicted of nothing.
It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.This is an astounding disregard for the facts.
The Constitution does not specifically disqualify candidates for public office due to criminal records.
You get nothing but pain from a dictator. Remember the guy you voted in is a convicted felon.
It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.
I did not say he's a dictator. Argue that point with the person that did instead of implying something I did not claim.Now, try to support the claim that he's a dictator, which has more merit to debunk than the circus court that convicted him of a felony, which I'm sure with due process in the appellate courts will be overturned and he will no longer be a felon by the end of 2027.
That's probably true of media such as Fox News, GBNews, and the Daily Telegraph, but there's a lot that I think may be reporting honestly and fairly.They only know what the mainstream media tells them what they should know.
I guess you can count the Daily Wire too... but, this is just outright disgusting and an insult to the victim. They released him on parole because they feared he would be deported under Trump.That's probably true of media such as Fox News, GBNews, and the Daily Telegraph, but there's a lot that I think may be reporting honestly and fairly.
But I also think there's loads that don't so ideally it's not a bad idea to question everything.
A convicted pedophile and illegal migrant was released from a Connecticut prison last month after his sympathetic parole board mulled how to best help him avoid deportation.
Well I would read that pedophile story and say he should serve his full sentence OR be deported on the understanding he would be locked up and serve his time. But at the same time I'd be wondering if we have the full story - I can sometimes be a bit of a devils' advocate, but where pedophiles are concerned I tend to think the standard punishment probably pales into insignificance compared with the damage done to an innocent young life. In this country pedophiles sometimes just get off with a suspended sentence or community service. Scandalous if you ask me.Trump being a felon is by far worse than what that parole board did.
Parole board call that was recorded (can't access calls according to the record, which shows parole was granted, unless you probably do a FIOA request because it's not publicly available, but luckily someone recorded it and uploaded it):But at the same time I'd be wondering if we have the full story
He couldn't serve his full sentence without being deported under the immigration reform underway. And, you can't force his host country to lock him up for crimes committed in the US.Well I would read that pedophile story and say he should serve his full sentence OR be deported on the understanding he would be locked up and serve his time.
Sure it is. /sBut Trump's felony was very serious, all the more because of his powerful position.
I assumed so but wondered if deals can be made.And, you can't force his host country to lock him up for crimes committed in the US.
Well I'm glad we agree on that at least. Although the law will never make such a distinction, ie "all are equal under the eyes of the law," when a person in a position of power or influence does it then it can make the felony worse even though technically it is the same. People that folks look up to - it's an old story.Sure it is. /s
new york court conviction (recorded) says otherwise.He was convicted of nothing.
Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.
He was convicted of nothing.
Go look at what project 2025 entails first then look at who you voted for.It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.
Now, try to support the claim that he's a dictator, which has more merit to debunk than the circus court that convicted him of a felony, which I'm sure with due process in the appellate courts will be overturned and he will no longer be a felon by the end of 2027.
The argument stems from this:
Which is worse: A felon that can take office or a dictator in office? If you believe the latter is true, I have no words.
Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.
He was convicted of nothing.
Turn off your TV. It has literally fried your brain enough, enough to call a lawyer and ask whether you can sue the television channels for emotional distress and suffering.Go look at what project 2025 entails first then look at who you voted for.
Agenda 47 | Project 2025 |
---|---|
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47 | https://www.project2025.org/policy/ |
The Heritage Foundation has a history of producing comprehensive policy guides for incoming conservative administrations, notably the "Mandate for Leadership" series. The inaugural "Mandate for Leadership" was published in 1981 to provide policy recommendations for the Reagan administration. Subsequent editions have been released to align with new presidential terms, including:
Each "Mandate for Leadership" serves as a detailed policy framework intended to guide conservative governance. While the exact number of such comprehensive projects is not specified, the "Mandate for Leadership" series stands out as a recurring and significant publication by the Heritage Foundation.
- Mandate II (1984): Continued the original's aim of reforming the federal government and strengthening U.S. defenses.
- Mandate III (1988): Offered policy strategies for the 1990s.
- Mandate IV (1996): Focused on presenting a political strategy for Congress to continue conservative policies.
- Mandate V (2000): Included insights from public sessions on implementing policy agendas.
- Mandate VI (2005): Emphasized principles to limit government and expand freedom.
- Mandate VII (2016): Provided a comprehensive policy agenda for the 2017 administration.
- Mandate VIII (2020): Titled "Mandate 2020: Clear Vision for the Next Administration."
- Mandate IX (2023): Part of "Project 2025," offering a detailed policy blueprint for the next conservative administration.
You have a convicted felon who is a criminal and a dictator in power.
Then look at all the terrible things he has done.
It seems you have mucked up and found out.
Never stop shouting!View attachment 317818
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!!
NEVER GIVE UP!!
WE ARE WINNING!!!
DONT HATE THE PLAYER!! HATE THE GAME!!
AND WE ARE OWNING THE GAME!!
If Truth isn’t moot to you, then why did Biden pardon his entire family hours before the Inauguration? Let alone other key figures currently under investigation like Pelosi, Gen. Millie and Fauci?Truth isn't moot to me.
I did not say he's a dictator. Argue that point with the person that did instead of implying something I did not claim.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.