Trump’s Tariffs

Don't post when you don't know. Makes you look stupid and ignorant.
They only know what the mainstream media tells them what they should know.

If he were a supposed dictator, he surely didn't prove that with a peaceful transition of power in 2020 (though, there was lawfare, but it all got ignored). If he was a dictator, one would assume he would've been "President Dictator" from 2016-2025~ and there wouldn't have been a Biden Presidency. But, logic escapes people like that.

But THIS time he's a dictator and will surely not transfer power. Or, we're supposed to believe that. :rolleyes:

Not to get political or anything...
 
This is an astounding disregard for the facts.
It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.
The Constitution does not specifically disqualify candidates for public office due to criminal records.

Now, try to support the claim that he's a dictator, which has more merit to debunk than the circus court that convicted him of a felony, which I'm sure with due process in the appellate courts will be overturned and he will no longer be a felon by the end of 2027.

The argument stems from this:
You get nothing but pain from a dictator. Remember the guy you voted in is a convicted felon.

Which is worse: A felon that can take office or a dictator in office? If you believe the latter is true, I have no words.
 
Last edited:
we are going to use tariffs to crush the Canadian economy!!

crush crush crush!!

crush-canada.webp


canada will be ours!!!


make canada usa again!!
 
It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.

Truth isn't moot to me.

Now, try to support the claim that he's a dictator, which has more merit to debunk than the circus court that convicted him of a felony, which I'm sure with due process in the appellate courts will be overturned and he will no longer be a felon by the end of 2027.
I did not say he's a dictator. Argue that point with the person that did instead of implying something I did not claim.
 
They only know what the mainstream media tells them what they should know.
That's probably true of media such as Fox News, GBNews, and the Daily Telegraph, but there's a lot that I think may be reporting honestly and fairly.

But I also think there's loads that don't so ideally it's not a bad idea to question everything.
 
That's probably true of media such as Fox News, GBNews, and the Daily Telegraph, but there's a lot that I think may be reporting honestly and fairly.

But I also think there's loads that don't so ideally it's not a bad idea to question everything.
I guess you can count the Daily Wire too... but, this is just outright disgusting and an insult to the victim. They released him on parole because they feared he would be deported under Trump.

THIS is what you support because the left has moved so far left that if you voted for anything other than immigration reform, this is what you got in return.

A convicted pedophile and illegal migrant was released from a Connecticut prison last month after his sympathetic parole board mulled how to best help him avoid deportation.

But, let's mull over the truth that Trump is a felon because that's so much more important to be widely known than the progressive agenda set forth to undermine America and the protection of our citizens.

Trump being a felon is by far worse than what that parole board did. And, yes, I'm quite familiar with the fallacies in my arguments. I just had to point this out because this is by far worse than "knowing the truth that Trump is a felon".

 
Trump being a felon is by far worse than what that parole board did.
Well I would read that pedophile story and say he should serve his full sentence OR be deported on the understanding he would be locked up and serve his time. But at the same time I'd be wondering if we have the full story - I can sometimes be a bit of a devils' advocate, but where pedophiles are concerned I tend to think the standard punishment probably pales into insignificance compared with the damage done to an innocent young life. In this country pedophiles sometimes just get off with a suspended sentence or community service. Scandalous if you ask me.

But Trump's felony was very serious, all the more because of his powerful position. It's good when people who think they are above the law due to their power or money find themselves on the pointy end of the justice system.
 
But at the same time I'd be wondering if we have the full story
Parole board call that was recorded (can't access calls according to the record, which shows parole was granted, unless you probably do a FIOA request because it's not publicly available, but luckily someone recorded it and uploaded it):
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

5:33 mark he "can't promise"... YOU CAN'T PROMISE?
Well I would read that pedophile story and say he should serve his full sentence OR be deported on the understanding he would be locked up and serve his time.
He couldn't serve his full sentence without being deported under the immigration reform underway. And, you can't force his host country to lock him up for crimes committed in the US.
But Trump's felony was very serious, all the more because of his powerful position.
Sure it is. /s
 
And, you can't force his host country to lock him up for crimes committed in the US.
I assumed so but wondered if deals can be made.
Sure it is. /s
Well I'm glad we agree on that at least. Although the law will never make such a distinction, ie "all are equal under the eyes of the law," when a person in a position of power or influence does it then it can make the felony worse even though technically it is the same. People that folks look up to - it's an old story.
 
It's moot anyway. Shout from the hilltop if you want.


Now, try to support the claim that he's a dictator, which has more merit to debunk than the circus court that convicted him of a felony, which I'm sure with due process in the appellate courts will be overturned and he will no longer be a felon by the end of 2027.

The argument stems from this:


Which is worse: A felon that can take office or a dictator in office? If you believe the latter is true, I have no words.
Go look at what project 2025 entails first then look at who you voted for.
It seems that Trump is not the Trump you voted in last time.
You have a convicted felon who is a criminal and a dictator in power.
Then look at all the terrible things he has done.
It seems you have mucked up and found out.
 
My understanding, and I stand to be corrected, is that Donald Trump was found guilty by a New York jury of 34 felony counts. He was subsequently granted an unconditional discharge, a sentence which apparently affirms that he remains a convicted felon.

The presiding judge could have handed down a four year sentence but chose not to because of defendant's circumstances (an elected president in waiting). However he didn't have the power to overturn the jury's verdict which still stands today.
 
Go look at what project 2025 entails first then look at who you voted for.
Turn off your TV. It has literally fried your brain enough, enough to call a lawyer and ask whether you can sue the television channels for emotional distress and suffering.

For one, Trump ran on Agenda 47 policy, not Project 2025.


Is there any overlap between the two? Yes, because Project 2025 is conservative-leaning, and some of Trump's policies are as well.

Project 2025 was made by the Heritage Foundation, which began publishing these policy positions since 1984, so there's nothing to do with Trump.

The Heritage Foundation has a history of producing comprehensive policy guides for incoming conservative administrations, notably the "Mandate for Leadership" series. The inaugural "Mandate for Leadership" was published in 1981 to provide policy recommendations for the Reagan administration. Subsequent editions have been released to align with new presidential terms, including:

  • Mandate II (1984): Continued the original's aim of reforming the federal government and strengthening U.S. defenses.
  • Mandate III (1988): Offered policy strategies for the 1990s.
  • Mandate IV (1996): Focused on presenting a political strategy for Congress to continue conservative policies.
  • Mandate V (2000): Included insights from public sessions on implementing policy agendas.
  • Mandate VI (2005): Emphasized principles to limit government and expand freedom.
  • Mandate VII (2016): Provided a comprehensive policy agenda for the 2017 administration.
  • Mandate VIII (2020): Titled "Mandate 2020: Clear Vision for the Next Administration."
  • Mandate IX (2023): Part of "Project 2025," offering a detailed policy blueprint for the next conservative administration.
Each "Mandate for Leadership" serves as a detailed policy framework intended to guide conservative governance. While the exact number of such comprehensive projects is not specified, the "Mandate for Leadership" series stands out as a recurring and significant publication by the Heritage Foundation.

You probably won't believe it from the horse's mouth either, since you will dismiss this and just call him a liar.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Anyway, on a side note, why are you so wrapped up in Trump and his policies being an Aussie citizen? Your country is by far worse. You should focus that time and energy on Aussie and fixing the dictatorial-like parties and people in power creating policies that are actually borderline what a dictator would put into place (we could flash back to C-19 and how that was handled country-wide, with riots in your streets, for instance).

You have a convicted felon who is a criminal and a dictator in power.

If you want me to really buy that we have a dictator in power, you would have to convince me that Biden wasn't President from 2020-2024 (he probably wasn't, and just doing what the party told him to do, an empty vessel with a pen in his hand, that is), and Trump would have been in office from 2016 until now (his 3rd term, essentially).

Then look at all the terrible things he has done.

Examples?

It seems you have mucked up and found out.

Oh, Australia is mucked up enough with who you all choose to elect.


On that note, I think we should Make America Great Again by following in Great Britain's footsteps and shipping all of our criminals to Australia. At this point, I honestly believe that Australia would be welcome to the idea, with how terrible (or "progressive") your government is.
 
Truth isn't moot to me.


I did not say he's a dictator. Argue that point with the person that did instead of implying something I did not claim.
If Truth isn’t moot to you, then why did Biden pardon his entire family hours before the Inauguration? Let alone other key figures currently under investigation like Pelosi, Gen. Millie and Fauci?

Would love to hear your reasoning for that one. Has Trump ever pardoned his family? Don’t think so. But ya know, he’s a dictator right?
As the other poster said, keep screaming from the hilltop.

 
Back
Top Bottom