LOL I +1 this feature suggestion. Twice I've been caught out by a typo. On the otherhand, let's say someone says something they shouldn't I feel the original quoted response should be left intact. With this implemented (if i understood correctly) the quoted remark will change to the authors updated edit.
Would be kinda a neat idea possibly if someone edits their original thread that's been quoted, but then goes back to fix spelling error or other. That any quotes of that thread update spelling or change in the quote as well.
I think this would actually be a bad idea. What if you quoted me to point out a typo, then I fix the typo and that fix propagates to the quote in your post?
Good point. I was about to edit my original reponse stating that. You beat me to it.
I'm going to start stalking your posts and quoting typos. I overlooked like 3-4 earlier today.
Do people even use the preview button lol
Anyways that would be too server intensive for just a couple typos. I would much direct these resources elsewhere.
I use it because TinyMCE is really horrible with spacing... I have to edit a lot to get spacing to be correct.
I have to agree with you there, sometimes when i paste into the box there are tabs and extra spaces which appears. I hope when they have the time they can code their own text box
I think this would actually be a bad idea. What if you quoted me to point out a typo, then I fix the typo and that fix propagates to the quote in your post?
Now that would be funny.What if someone typed something you agreed with, you quoted it saying +1!, then they changed it to something completely different. Possibly filled with colorful language or rants, which you did not agree with.
Now that would be funny.
I'm now going to +1 this suggestion
Thoughts of server intensive comes to mind, however kier and mike are wizards at coding ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.