DoctorWatsOn
Well-known member
I never said there had been, I said there are fears one could happen as mentioned on the BBC News site.There hasn't been any 'reactor blast', the reactors remain intact.
Actually you posted, "there are also fears of a second reactor blast happening", which implies there had already been a 'reactor blast', there HAS NOT BEEN ONE!
OK, not totally your fault - you quoted a sloppy BBC headline without taking into consideration the second paragraph of the article, which clearly states "the facility could withstand the impact and the nuclear reactor itself would not be damaged". Believe me if there was a 'reactor blast', the reactor WOULD BE damaged.
Not trying to have a go at you, but I am getting tried of sloppy media reporting and people re-posting stupid headlines and total nonsense as facts across the internet and I am just trying, in my own little way, to correct things.
That indicates there has been a first one.There is a risk of a second explosion at the quake-hit Fukushima power station, Japanese officials have said.
Yes, there has been an explosion, in a SERVICE BUILDING, it has NOT been a 'reactor blast'!
See post 166 to understand the different between the reactor and the service building above it.